ArticleMedicine2018
Clinical evaluation of the loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the detection of common lower respiratory pathogens in patients with respiratory symptoms.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of Molecular Amplification Assays for Diagnosis of Staphylococcal Pneumonia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2021Pooled it
- Reproducibility crisis in isothermal amplification: lessons from benchmarking LAMP assays.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- RPA Combined With CRISPR/Cas12a for Rapid and Ultrasensitive Detection Dual-Gene of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).Journal of molecular recognition : JMR · 2026Article
- The value of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in diagnosing lower respiratory tract infections in children.Practical laboratory medicine · 2025Article
- Application of a clamshell isothermal nucleic acid amplification analyzer in the detection of lower respiratory tract bacteria.Practical laboratory medicine · 2024Article
- Detection of respiratory pathogenic bacterial nucleic acid detection by Loop-mediated Isothermal Amplification in patients with bacterial pulmonary infections.Practical laboratory medicine · 2023Article
- Rapid, accurate, and novel diagnostic technique for respiratory pathogens: Clinical application of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay in older patients with pneumonia, a multicenter prospective observational study.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- A High-Throughput, Multi-Index Isothermal Amplification Platform for Rapid Detection of 19 Types of Common Respiratory Viruses Including SARS-CoV-2.Engineering (Beijing, China) · 2020Review
- Evaluation of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid combined with the loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay in lower respiratory tract infections.American journal of translational research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are a substantial public health problem and a leading cause of significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate a commercially available loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the simultaneously detection of thirteen common lower respiratory pathogens in patients with respiratory symptoms. All participants age from 1 to 101 years old were recruited from inpatient or outpatient of Meizhou People's Hospital between October 2016 and March 2018. A total of 1767 sputum samples and 88 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from patients with suspected LRTI were collected. For each sample, a parallel study using both routine bacterial culture-based and LAMP assays were carried out. In total, 810 (44.85%) out of the 1855 samples were found to be positive infected with respiratory pathogens by using the LAMP assays. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MecA) was the most predominant bacterial pathogens, with proportions of 17.09% in sputum and 10.23% bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples, respectively. The proportions of bacterial pathogen infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spn) (24.24%) was relatively high in aged <15 group (P <.001) while the proportions of bacterial pathogen infection with MecA (22.89%) was relatively high in aged >60 group (P <.001). Bacterial pathogen infection with MecA having the highest prevalence with proportions of 17.81% and 13.94% in male and female, respectively. A statistically higher proportion of male group had bacterial pathogen infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pae) in this study (P = .035). Comparison of results between the LAMP assay and culture method was conducted and our results indicated that there was higher detection rate by the LAMP assay than the bacterial culture method. Comparison of the results obtained with the LAMP assay and those obtained by sequencing analysis, when the sequencing method was set to 100%, demonstrating that the LAMP assay is 100% specific and 95.50% sensitive. The technique of LAMP assay was proved to be a simple, sensitive, specific, convenient, and rapid method, which can be implemented for diagnosing pathogenic bacteria in patients with LRTIs in primary labs without any need for expensive equipment or specialized techniques in resource-limited areas of China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.