Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30572483›Full record

ArticleMedicine2018

Clinical evaluation of the loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the detection of common lower respiratory pathogens in patients with respiratory symptoms.

Jingyuan Hou, Heming Wu, Xing Zeng, Hui Rao, Pingsen Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jingyuan HouClinical Core Laboratory.
Heming WuClinical Core Laboratory.
Xing ZengClinical Core Laboratory.
Hui RaoClinical Core Laboratory.
Pingsen ZhaoClinical Core Laboratory.
Core Laboratories (United States) · USMeizhou City People's Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are a substantial public health problem and a leading cause of significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate a commercially available loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the simultaneously detection of thirteen common lower respiratory pathogens in patients with respiratory symptoms. All participants age from 1 to 101 years old were recruited from inpatient or outpatient of Meizhou People's Hospital between October 2016 and March 2018. A total of 1767 sputum samples and 88 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from patients with suspected LRTI were collected. For each sample, a parallel study using both routine bacterial culture-based and LAMP assays were carried out. In total, 810 (44.85%) out of the 1855 samples were found to be positive infected with respiratory pathogens by using the LAMP assays. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MecA) was the most predominant bacterial pathogens, with proportions of 17.09% in sputum and 10.23% bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples, respectively. The proportions of bacterial pathogen infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spn) (24.24%) was relatively high in aged <15 group (P <.001) while the proportions of bacterial pathogen infection with MecA (22.89%) was relatively high in aged >60 group (P <.001). Bacterial pathogen infection with MecA having the highest prevalence with proportions of 17.81% and 13.94% in male and female, respectively. A statistically higher proportion of male group had bacterial pathogen infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pae) in this study (P = .035). Comparison of results between the LAMP assay and culture method was conducted and our results indicated that there was higher detection rate by the LAMP assay than the bacterial culture method. Comparison of the results obtained with the LAMP assay and those obtained by sequencing analysis, when the sequencing method was set to 100%, demonstrating that the LAMP assay is 100% specific and 95.50% sensitive. The technique of LAMP assay was proved to be a simple, sensitive, specific, convenient, and rapid method, which can be implemented for diagnosing pathogenic bacteria in patients with LRTIs in primary labs without any need for expensive equipment or specialized techniques in resource-limited areas of China.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMolecular TypingNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesRespiratory Tract Infections

Identifiers

PMID30572483
PMCPMC6320021
OpenAlexW2906175005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.