SynthesisMedicine2018
Effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Effectiveness of High-Intensity Laser Therapy in Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy: A Randomized Study of Double Blınd With Sham Control
Efficacy of High Intensity Laser Treatment in Hemiplegic Shoulder Patients
Effect of High-intensity Laser Therapy in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain. Randomized Clinical Trial
Comparison of High Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) for the Treatment of Plantar Flexor Spasticity in Post-Stroke Patients
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy for patellofemoral pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy for tendinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Lasers in medical science · 2026Pooled it
- The importance of power in photobiomodulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-intensity laser therapy.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy versus laser therapy in treating musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lasers in medical science · 2025Pooled it
- Quality appraisal of systematic reviews on high-intensity laser therapy for musculoskeletal pain management: an umbrella review.Lasers in medical science · 2024Pooled it
- High-intensity versus low-level laser in musculoskeletal disorders.Lasers in medical science · 2024Pooled it
- High-intensity laser therapy in low back pain management: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Lasers in medical science · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and high-intensity laser therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Trial
- Functional and ultrasonographic evaluation of high intensity laser therapy and Kinesio taping in stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial.Lasers in medical science · 2026Trial
- High-intensity laser therapy can improve pain, health status and quality of life in women with fibromyalgia: a single blinded-randomized controlled trial.Lasers in medical science · 2025Trial
- Piano level laser therapy versus epidermal growth factor injection for painful myogenic temporomandibular disorder (a randomized clinical trial).Clinical oral investigations · 2025Trial
- Effectiveness of high-intensity laser application combined with splinting and therapeutic exercise in subacute de Quervain's tenosynovitis: A pilot study.Lasers in medical science · 2023Trial
- The effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy in the treatment of post-stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain: a prospective randomized controlled study.Lasers in medical science · 2022Trial
- Efficacy of high-intensity laser therapy in patients with adhesive capsulitis: a sham-controlled randomized controlled trial.Lasers in medical science · 2021Trial
- The effect of high intensity laser therapy in the management of painful calcaneal spur: a double blind, placebo-controlled study.Lasers in medical science · 2020Trial
- High-Intensity Laser Therapy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- High-Intensity Laser Therapy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Most Common Injuries in Resistance Training: Mechanisms, Therapeutic Interventions, and Preventive Strategies.Cureus · 2025Review
- Immediate effects of high-intensity laser therapy for nonspecific neck pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- High- and Low-Level Laser Therapy for the Treatment of Orthopedic Pain: A Systematic Review.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) has been used for the management of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD), studies examining the effectiveness of HILT have been limited. We investigated the effectiveness of HILT in MSD using a systematic review and meta-analysis.
methodsWe searched the ovid MEDLINE, ovid Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL library, and Web of Science until January, 2018. Relevant studies concerning the effectiveness of HILT in patients with MSD were included. Both placebo and active controls were considered as comparators and only randomized controlled trial (RCT) design studies were included. Risk of bias (ROB) was used for the quality assessment of the RCT. For continuous variables, a meta-analysis was conducted using an inverse variance random effects model. The mean difference (MD) for visual analog scale pain and standardized mean difference (SMD) for disability were applied.
resultsTwelve studies were selected for this systematic review. In 11 studies, comprising 736 patients, pain was significantly improved by HILT compared with a control group (MD: -1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.28 to -0.74). From the analysis of 688 patients from 10 studies, the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of HILT showed a significant improvement in disability scores compared with those in the control group (SMD, -1.09; 95% CI -1.77, -0.41). In subgroup analysis by treatment regions, the mean difference (MD) in neck pain was the highest at -1.02 (95% CI: -1.45, -0.58) than in controls, followed by back pain (MD, -0.91; 95% CI: -1.24, -0.59).
conclusionsThe results of this study show that HILT treatment for back and neck pain significantly improved pain and disability scores compared with controls. The ROB of the included studies was moderate; however, significant heterogeneity existed. Thus, additional well-designed studies involving larger samples with long-term follow-up are needed to further assess each laser application, treatment region, and comparator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.