Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30572421›Full record

ArticleAnnals of coloproctology2018

Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection.

Mostafa Shalaby, Waleed Thabet, Oreste Buonomo, Nicola Di Lorenzo, Mosaad Morshed, Giuseppe Petrella, Mohamed Farid, Pierpaolo Sileri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of coloproctology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Surgical complications in colorectal cancer patients.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mostafa ShalabyDepartment of General Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Waleed ThabetDepartment General Surgery, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Oreste BuonomoDepartment of General Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Nicola Di LorenzoDepartment of General Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Mosaad MorshedDepartment General Surgery, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Giuseppe PetrellaDepartment of General Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Mohamed FaridDepartment General Surgery, Mansoura University Hospitals, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Pierpaolo SileriDepartment of General Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe evaluate the role of transanal tube drainage (TD) as a conservative treatment for patients with anastomotic leakage (AL).

methodsPatients treated for AL who had undergone a low or an ultralow anterior resection with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis for the treatment of rectal cancer between January 2013 and January 2017 were enrolled in this study. The data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcomes were the diagnosis and the management of AL.

resultsTwo hundred thirteen consecutive patients, 122 males and 91 females, were included. The mean age was 66.91 ± 11.15 years, and the median body mass index was 24 kg/m2 (range, 20-35 kg/m2 ). The median tumor distance from the anal verge was 8 cm (range, 4-12 cm). Ninety-three patients (44%) received neoadjuvant therapy for nodal disease and/or locally advanced rectal cancer. Only 13 patients (6%) developed AL. Six patients developed subclinical AL as they had a defunctioning ileostomy at the time of the initial procedure. They were treated conservatively with TD under endoscopic guidance in the endoscopy unit and received intravenous antibiotics. Six weeks after discharge, these 6 patients underwent follow-up flexible sigmoidoscopy which showed a completely healed anastomotic defect with no residual stenosis. Seven patients developed a clinically significant AL and required reoperation with pelvic abscess drainage and Hartmann colostomy formation.

conclusionThese results suggest that TD for management of patients with AL is safe, cheap, and effective. Salvaging the anastomosis will help decrease the need for Hartmann colostomy formation. Proper patient selection is important.

Indexed as

AnastomosisAnastomotic leakageRectal cancerTransanal tube drainage

Identifiers

PMID30572421
PMCPMC6347340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.