ArticleAnnals of coloproctology2018
Transanal Tube Drainage as a Conservative Treatment for Anastomotic Leakage Following a Rectal Resection.
Article in Annals of coloproctology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transanal drainage tube versus diverting stoma for reducing anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Challenges in the interdisciplinary treatment of leakages after left-sided colorectal surgery: endoscopic negative pressure therapy, open-pore film drainage therapy and beyond.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Article
- Significance of information obtained during transanal drainage tube placement after anterior resection of colorectal cancer.PloS one · 2022Article
- Retrospective study of active drainage in the management of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Article
- Treatment Modalities for Anastomotic Leakage in Rectal Cancer Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2021Review
- The usefulness of transanal tube for reducing anastomotic leak in mid rectal cancer: compared to diverting stoma.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2021Article
- Percutaneous transesophageal gastro-tubing for the management of anastomotic leakage after upper GI surgery: a report of two clinical cases.Surgical case reports · 2020Article
- Effect comparison of three different types of transanal drainage tubes after anterior resection for rectal cancer.BMC surgery · 2020Article
- Surgical complications in colorectal cancer patients.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2020Review
- Improved colorectal anastomotic leakage healing by transanal rinsing treatment after endoscopic vacuum therapy using a novel patient-applied rinsing catheter.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe evaluate the role of transanal tube drainage (TD) as a conservative treatment for patients with anastomotic leakage (AL).
methodsPatients treated for AL who had undergone a low or an ultralow anterior resection with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis for the treatment of rectal cancer between January 2013 and January 2017 were enrolled in this study. The data were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcomes were the diagnosis and the management of AL.
resultsTwo hundred thirteen consecutive patients, 122 males and 91 females, were included. The mean age was 66.91 ± 11.15 years, and the median body mass index was 24 kg/m2 (range, 20-35 kg/m2 ). The median tumor distance from the anal verge was 8 cm (range, 4-12 cm). Ninety-three patients (44%) received neoadjuvant therapy for nodal disease and/or locally advanced rectal cancer. Only 13 patients (6%) developed AL. Six patients developed subclinical AL as they had a defunctioning ileostomy at the time of the initial procedure. They were treated conservatively with TD under endoscopic guidance in the endoscopy unit and received intravenous antibiotics. Six weeks after discharge, these 6 patients underwent follow-up flexible sigmoidoscopy which showed a completely healed anastomotic defect with no residual stenosis. Seven patients developed a clinically significant AL and required reoperation with pelvic abscess drainage and Hartmann colostomy formation.
conclusionThese results suggest that TD for management of patients with AL is safe, cheap, and effective. Salvaging the anastomosis will help decrease the need for Hartmann colostomy formation. Proper patient selection is important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.