Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30572031›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2019

Best Practices Recommendations for Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry in Lung Cancer.

Yasushi Yatabe, Sanja Dacic, Alain C Borczuk, Arne Warth, Prudence A Russell, Sylvie Lantuejoul, Mary Beth Beasley, Erik Thunnissen, Giuseppe Pelosi, Natasha Rekhtman and 22 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 157 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
157citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

157 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 343 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Updated guidelines for predictive biomarker testing in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. IASLC Update on Classification of Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Materials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 20 institutions in 14 countries.

Yasushi YatabeDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan. Electronic address: yyatabi@aichi-cc.jp.
Sanja DacicDepartment of Pathology University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Alain C BorczukDepartment of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Arne WarthInstitute of Pathology, Cytopathology, and Molecular Pathology MVZ UEGP Giessen, Wetzlar, Limburg, Germany.
Prudence A RussellAnatomical Pathology Department, St. Vincent's Hospital and the University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Sylvie LantuejoulDepartment of Biopathology, Centre Léon Bérard, Grenoble Alpes University, Lyon, France.
Mary Beth BeasleyDepartment of Pathology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York.
Erik ThunnissenDepartment of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Giuseppe PelosiDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan and IRCCS MultiMedica, Milan, Italy.
Natasha RekhtmanDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Lukas BubendorfInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Mari Mino-KenudsonDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Akihiko YoshidaDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kim R GeisingerDepartment of Pathology, The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.
Masayuki NoguchiDepartment of Pathology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Lucian R ChirieacDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Johan BoltingDepartment of Immunology Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jin-Haeng ChungDepartment of Pathology and Respiratory Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam city, Gyeonggi- do, Republic of Korea.
Teh-Ying ChouDivision of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Republic of China.
Gang ChenDepartment of Pathology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Claudia PoleriOffice of Pathology Consultants, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fernando Lopez-RiosLaboratorio de Dianas Terapeuticas, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain.
Mauro PapottiDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Lynette M ShollDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Anja C RodenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Minnesota.
William D TravisDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Fred R HirschUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
Keith M KerrDepartment of Pathology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen University Medical School, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Ming-Sound TsaoDepartment of Pathology, University Health Network/Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew G NicholsonDepartment of Histopathology, Royal Brompton and Harefield National Health Service Foundation Trust and National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Ignacio WistubaDepartment of Translational Molecular Pathology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Andre L MoreiraDepartment of Pathology, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York.
Harvard University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USAberdeen Royal Infirmary · GBAichi Cancer Center · JPAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCentre Léon Bérard · FRHospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro · ESMayo Clinic · USMedical Oncology Hematology Consultants · USMount Sinai Medical Center · USMultiMedica · ITNYU Langone Health · USRoyal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust · GBSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AUSun Yat-sen University · CNTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TWThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USTokyo National Hospital · JP

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the 2015 WHO classification was introduced into clinical practice, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has figured prominently in lung cancer diagnosis. In addition to distinction of small cell versus non-small cell carcinoma, patients' treatment of choice is directly linked to histologic subtypes of non-small cell carcinoma, which pertains to IHC results, particularly for poorly differentiated tumors. The use of IHC has improved diagnostic accuracy in the classification of lung carcinoma, but the interpretation of IHC results remains challenging in some instances. Also, pathologists must be aware of many interpretation pitfalls, and the use of IHC should be efficient to spare the tissue for molecular testing. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee received questions on practical application and interpretation of IHC in lung cancer diagnosis. After discussions in several International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Pathology Committee meetings, the issues and caveats were summarized in terms of 11 key questions covering common and important diagnostic situations in a daily clinical practice with some relevant challenging queries. The questions cover topics such as the best IHC markers for distinguishing NSCLC subtypes, differences in thyroid transcription factor 1 clones, and the utility of IHC in diagnosing uncommon subtypes of lung cancer and distinguishing primary from metastatic tumors. This article provides answers and explanations for the key questions about the use of IHC in diagnosis of lung carcinoma, representing viewpoints of experts in thoracic pathology that should assist the community in the appropriate use of IHC in diagnostic pathology.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBiomarkers, TumorDiagnosis, DifferentialEarly Detection of CancerHumansImmunohistochemistryLung NeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicPrognosisAntibodies, MonoclonalBiomarkers, TumorImmunohistochemistryLung cancerNeuroendocrine markersp40TTF1

Identifiers

PMID30572031
PMCPMC6422775
OpenAlexW2903909248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.