Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30571705›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Rapid and sensitive detection of Chlamydia trachomatis sexually transmitted infections in resource-constrained settings in Thailand at the point-of-care.

Naraporn Somboonna, Ilada Choopara, Narong Arunrut, Kanchapan Sukhonpan, Jarun Sayasathid, Deborah Dean, Wansika Kiatpathomchai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Visual and rapid identification ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Sensitive and visual identification ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Current and Future Trends in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Infections.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Naraporn SomboonnaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7830-3509
Ilada ChooparaProgram in Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Narong ArunrutBioengineering and Sensing Technology Laboratory, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Khlong Nueng, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Kanchapan SukhonpanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Buddhachinaraj Phitsanulok Hospital, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Jarun SayasathidCardiac Center, Naresuan University Hospital, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Deborah DeanCenter for Immunobiology and Vaccine Development, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute, Oakland, California, United States of America.
Wansika KiatpathomchaiBioengineering and Sensing Technology Laboratory, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Khlong Nueng, Khlong Luang, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisFemaleHumansMaleSensitivity and SpecificityThailandTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID30571705
PMCPMC6301561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.