Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30571681›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Optimisation of children z-score calculation based on new statistical techniques.

Antonio Martinez-Millana, Jessie M Hulst, Mieke Boon, Peter Witters, Carlos Fernandez-Llatas, Ines Asseiceira, Joaquin Calvo-Lerma, Ignacio Basagoiti, Vicente Traver, Kris De Boeck and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Parental and Peer Relationships and Their Impact on Symptom Severity in Adolescent Patients With Anorexia Nervosa.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impairments in personality functioning in adolescents with anorexia nervosa.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2025
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Inter-scanner comparability of Z-scores for native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Antonio Martinez-MillanaITACA, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1056-5067
Jessie M HulstErasmus Medical Center, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mieke BoonDepartment of Paediatrics, University Hospital of Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Peter WittersDepartment of Paediatrics, University Hospital of Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Carlos Fernandez-LlatasITACA, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Ines AsseiceiraAssociação Portuguesa para a Investigação e Desenvolvimento da Faculdade de Medicina, Lisbon, Portugal.
Joaquin Calvo-LermaInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Ignacio BasagoitiITACA, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Vicente TraverITACA, Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, Spain.
Kris De BoeckDepartment of Paediatrics, University Hospital of Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Carmen Ribes-KoninckxInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpressing anthropometric parameters (height, weight, BMI) as z-score is a key principle in the clinical assessment of children and adolescents. The Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) growth charts and the CDC-LMS method for z-score calculation are widely used to assess growth and nutritional status, though they can be imprecise in some percentiles.

objectiveTo improve the accuracy of z-score calculation by revising the statistical method using the original data used to develop current z-score calculators.

designA Gaussian Process Regressions (GPR) was designed and internally validated. Z-scores for weight-for-age (WFA), height-for-age (HFA) and BMI-for-age (BMIFA) were compared with WHO and CDC-LMS methods in 1) standard z-score cut-off points, 2) simulated population of 3000 children and 3) real observations 212 children aged 2 to 18 yo.

resultsGPR yielded more accurate calculation of z-scores for standard cut-off points (p<<0.001) with respect to CDC-LMS and WHO approaches. WFA, HFA and BMIFA z-score calculations based on the 3 different methods using simulated and real patients, showed a large variation irrespective of gender and age. Z-scores around 0 +/- 1 showed larger variation than the values above and below +/- 2.

conclusionThe revised z-score calculation method was more accurate than CDC-LMS and WHO methods for standard cut-off points. On simulated and real data, GPR based calculation provides more accurate z-score determinations, and thus, a better classification of patients below and above cut-off points. Statisticians and clinicians should consider the potential benefits of updating their calculation method for an accurate z-score determination.

Indexed as

AnthropometryBody HeightBody Mass IndexBody WeightChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNutritional StatusRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID30571681
PMCPMC6301782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.