ArticlePLoS computational biology2018
Ten simple rules for documenting scientific software.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating LC-HRMS metabolomics data processing software using FAIR principles for research software.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2023Pooled it
- Selector: A General Python Library for Diverse Subset Selection.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Selector: A General Python Library for Diverse Subset Selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Ten principles for reliable, efficient, and adaptable coding in psychology and cognitive neuroscience.Communications psychology · 2025Review
- Reviewability and supportability: New complementary principles to empower research software practices.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- DataDesc: A framework for creating and sharing technical metadata for research software interfaces.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- ENCORE: a practical implementation to improve reproducibility and transparency of computational research.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules for training scientists to make better software.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Democratizing cheminformatics: interpretable chemical grouping using an automated KNIME workflow.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Making Biomedical Research Software FAIR: Actionable Step-by-step Guidelines with a User-support Tool.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Ten quick tips for avoiding pitfalls in multi-omics data integration analyses.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Ten simple rules for working with other people's code.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Ten simple rules for providing bioinformatics support within a hospital.BioData mining · 2023Article
- Ten simple rules for reporting a bug.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Advancing code sharing in the computational biology community.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Documenting research software in engineering science.Scientific reports · 2022Review
- Ten simple rules for making a software tool workflow-ready.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- A large-scale study on research code quality and execution.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Ten simple rules for researchers who want to develop web apps.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.