Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30571382›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2018

Eligibility, Clinical Outcomes, and Budget Impact of PCSK9 Inhibitor Adoption: The CANHEART PCSK9 Study.

Dennis T Ko, Anam M Khan, Gynter Kotrri, Peter C Austin, Harindra C Wijeysundera, Maria Koh, Anna Chu, Cynthia A Jackevicius, Patrick R Lawler, Jack V Tu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. RNA Therapies in Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome: Advancing Disease Management.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Role of Bempedoic Acid in Clinical Practice.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2021
    Review
  8. Inherited Variants inCirculation research · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Just Price for PCSK9 Inhibitors: No less, No More.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dennis T Ko1 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto Ontario Canada.
Anam M Khan1 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto Ontario Canada.
Gynter Kotrri1 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto Ontario Canada.
Peter C Austin1 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto Ontario Canada.
Harindra C Wijeysundera1 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto Ontario Canada.
Maria Koh1 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto Ontario Canada.
Anna Chu1 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto Ontario Canada.
Cynthia A Jackevicius1 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto Ontario Canada.
Patrick R Lawler1 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto Ontario Canada.
Jack V Tu1 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto Ontario Canada.
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The FOURIER (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9i [Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin-Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors] in Subjects With Elevated Risk) trial found a reduction in cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease ( ASCVD ). Our objective was to estimate the eligibility, clinical outcomes, and budget impact of adopting PCSK 9i in a large healthcare system. Methods and Results Ontario, Canada, residents alive in 2011, aged 40 to 85 years, were eligible for inclusion. PCSK 9i eligibility was determined on the basis of FOURIER trial definition. Hazard ratios observed in the FOURIER trial were applied to assess the number of events that could be avoided. Budget impact was calculated as the difference between projected costs of treatment adoption and events avoided if PCSK 9i were used. Of the 2.4 million included individuals, 5.3% had a history of ASCVD . We estimated that 2.7% of the general population and 51.9% of the patients with ASCVD would be eligible for PCSK 9i. Adoption of PCSK 9i in all eligible patients with ASCVD was projected to reduce primary events rates by 1.8% after 3 years. Despite cost reduction of $44 million in events, PCSK 9i adoption would have a net budget impact of $1.5 billion over 3 years. Potential benefits of PCSK 9i varied widely across subgroups, with the largest absolute risk reduction estimated to be 4.3% at 3 years in peripheral artery disease. In this subgroup of 5601 patients, the budget impact of treatment adoption was $116 million. Conclusions We estimated that ≈1 in 2 patients with ASCVD would be eligible for PCSK 9i. The budget impact of adopting PCSK 9i for all patients with ASCVD is substantial. Selective adoption to high-risk patients will lessen the overall budgetary impact of PCSK 9i treatment.

Indexed as

BudgetsPatient SelectionPCSK9 InhibitorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProprotein Convertase 9Treatment OutcomePCSK9 InhibitorsPCSK9 protein, humanProprotein Convertase 9atherosclerosislow‐density lipoprotein cholesteroloutcomeproprotein convertase subtilisin‐kexin type 9

Identifiers

PMID30571382
PMCPMC6404170
OpenAlexW2899889410

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.