ArticleCirculation. Heart failure2018
Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk Score and EuroSCORE-2 Appropriately Assess 30-Day Postoperative Mortality in the STICH Trial and a Contemporary Cohort of Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Surgical Revascularization.
Article in Circulation. Heart failure, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH)
Prognostic Value of Lung Ultrasound in Predicting Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay in Adult Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive analysis of acute kidney injury incidence following transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13,777 patients.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of baseline risk of death or hospitalization on effectiveness of revascularization in patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction-a prespecified analysis of REVIVED-BCIS2.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2025Trial
- Surgical Risk and Revascularization-An Update.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Intravascular lithotripsy enables safe and effective transfemoral aortic valve replacement.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025Article
- Surgical Risk and Long-Term Mortality With PCI and CABG in Ischemic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Optimizing Revascularization in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Comparative Evidence on the Benefits and Indications of CABG and PCI.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Early Mortality in Cardiac Surgery - Is Lactate Significant?Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence and predictive models for early detection of acute kidney injury: transforming clinical practice.BMC nephrology · 2024Review
- A Single-Surgeon Experience Transitioning to Total Arterial Revascularization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Selecting the appropriate patients for coronary artery bypass grafting in ischemic cardiomyopathy-importance of myocardial viability.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024Review
- Prognostic factors of surgical management for heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: Puzzle Solved?Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Myocardial Revascularization in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: For Whom and How.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Review
- MAGGIC, STS, and EuroSCORE II Risk Score Comparison After Aortic and Mitral Valve Surgery.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2021Article
- Development and Validation of a Novel Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Comparison of Heart Team vs Interventional Cardiologist Recommendations for the Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.JAMA network open · 2020Article
- Fluorine 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Cardiac Viability Risk Stratification in Comparison with EuroSCORE II for Revascularization in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction.Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, IndiaArticle
- Building and Optimizing the Interdisciplinary Heart Team.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsReview
- Current Landscape and Future Directions of Coronary Revascularization in Ischemic Systolic Heart Failure: A Review.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe STICH trial (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure) demonstrated a survival benefit of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular dysfunction. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score and the EuroSCORE-2 (ES2) are used for risk assessment in cardiac surgery, with little information available about their accuracy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. We assessed the ability of the STS score and ES2 to evaluate 30-day postoperative mortality risk in STICH and a contemporary cohort (CC) of patients with a left ventricle ejection fraction ≤35% undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting outside of a trial setting. METHODS AND
resultsThe STS and ES2 scores were calculated for 814 STICH patients and 1246 consecutive patients in a CC. There were marked variations in 30-day postoperative mortality risk from 1 patient to another. The STS scores consistently calculated lower risk scores than ES2 (1.5 versus 2.9 for the CC and 0.9 versus 2.4 for the STICH cohort), and underestimated postoperative mortality risk. The STS and ES2 scores had moderately good C statistics: CC (0.727, 95% CI: 0.650-0.803 for STS, and 0.707, 95% CI: 0.620-0.795 for ES2); STICH (0.744, 95% CI: 0.677-0.812, for STS and 0.736, 95% CI: 0.665-0.808 for ES2). Despite the CC patients having higher STS and ES2 scores than STICH patients, mortality (3.5%) was lower than that of STICH (4.8%), suggesting a possible decrease in postoperative mortality over the past decade.
conclusionsThe 30-day postoperative mortality risk of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with left ventricular dysfunction varies markedly. Both the STS and ES2 score are effective in evaluating risk, although the STS score tend to underestimate risk. CLINICAL
trial registrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00023595.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.