Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30570787›Full record

Trial reportClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology2019

Efficacy and safety of birch pollen allergoid subcutaneous immunotherapy: A 2-year double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial plus 1-year open-label extension.

Margitta Worm, Sabina Rak, Boleslaw Samoliński, Jukka Antila, Ann-Sofi Höiby, Brigitte Kruse, Agnieszka Lipiec, Michael Rudert, Erkka Valovirta

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIClinical Trial, Phase IVMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Efficacy ofJournal of asthma and allergy · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Focused allergic rhinitis practice parameter for Canada.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Allergen immunotherapy: past, present and future.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Guideline on allergen immunotherapy in IgE-mediated allergic diseases: S2K Guideline of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), Society of Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), Austrian Society of Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), Swiss Society for Allergology and Immunology (SSAI), German Dermatological Society (DDG), German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), Society of Pediatric Pulmonology (GPP), German Respiratory Society (DGP), German Professional Association of Otolaryngologists (BVHNO), German Association of Paediatric and Adolescent Care Specialists (BVKJ), Federal Association of Pneumologists, Sleep and Respiratory Physicians (BdP), Professional Association of German Dermatologists (BVDD).Allergologie select · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Margitta WormDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Dermatology, Allergy and Venerology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3449-1245
Sabina RakAsthma and Allergy Research Group, Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Boleslaw SamolińskiDepartment of the Prevention of Environmental Hazards and Allergology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Jukka AntilaEar, Nose and Throat Clinic, Terveystalo Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Ann-Sofi HöibyAsthma and Allergy Research Group, Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Brigitte KruseAllergopharma GmbH & Co. KG, Reinbek, Germany.
Agnieszka LipiecDepartment of the Prevention of Environmental Hazards and Allergology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Michael RudertAllergopharma GmbH & Co. KG, Reinbek, Germany.
Erkka ValovirtaDepartment of Lung Diseases and Clinical Allergology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLSahlgrenska University Hospital · SECarolina Ear, Nose and Throat Clinic · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious clinical trials with birch pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy have been conducted over a 1- to 2-year treatment period and involved mostly a single geographic location.

objectiveThis study (EudraCT-Number: 2005-000025-35) intended to evaluate the effect of subcutaneous immunotherapy with high-dose hypoallergenic birch pollen allergoid in patients with confirmed moderate to severe seasonal allergic rhinitis/rhinoconjunctivitis over a 3-year course in 19 European centres.

methodsAdults with confirmed birch pollen allergy (n = 253) were randomized to preseasonal placebo (n = 129) or active treatment (n = 124). Primary endpoint was change in Symptom Medication Score after 2 years treatment (2007).

resultsThe change in Symptom Medication Score of active- vs placebo-treated patients for the Full Analysis Set (n = 227, 15.2% reduction, P = 0.0710) and Per-Protocol Set (n = 216, 16.7% reduction, P = 0.0523) showed a positive trend, although significance was not achieved. The primary endpoint, assessed in 2007, coincided with the lowest pollination during the study period. In a subgroup analysis of patients in the north-eastern region (n = 102), where birch is the major tree and consequently patients' exposure is higher, changes in Symptom Medication Score (32.7% reduction, P = 0.0034) and median number of well days (P = 0.0232) were highly significant in favour of the active group. During the open-label third year of treatment, the mean Symptom Medication Score of active-treated patients was further reduced despite an increased pollen count. Subcutaneous immunotherapy was well tolerated and consistent with the known safety profile. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although the primary endpoint was not reached for the Full Analysis Set, a significant and clinically relevant effect on Symptom Medication Score was clearly demonstrated for the subgroup of patients in the north-eastern region of Europe, where birch is the predominant tree species. Proving efficacy of birch allergen subcutaneous immunotherapy is challenging due to the numerous factors influencing birch pollen allergen exposure in field studies.

Indexed as

Desensitization, ImmunologicAdolescentAdultAllergensArea Under CurveBetulaFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin EInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedPollenRhinitis, Allergic, SeasonalTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAllergensImmunoglobulin Eallergens and epitopesimmunotherapy and tolerance inductionrhinitis

Identifiers

PMID30570787
PMCPMC6849700
OpenAlexW2905894104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.