Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30570649›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2019

Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Advanced, Metastatic Adenocarcinoma or Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: The Phase 2 KEYNOTE-180 Study.

Manish A Shah, Takashi Kojima, Daniel Hochhauser, Peter Enzinger, Judith Raimbourg, Antoine Hollebecque, Florian Lordick, Sung-Bae Kim, Masahiro Tajika, Heung Tae Kim and 10 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 312 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
312citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
56.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02559687 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Third Line Previously Treated Subjects With Advanced/Metastatic Adenocarcinoma or Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus or Advanced/Metastatic Siewert Type I Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction (KEYNOTE-180)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2015 to 2021Enrolled121ConditionsEsophageal Carcinoma, Esophagogastric Junction CarcinomaArmspembrolizumab
NCT05213312 phase2 / phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Multicenter, Double Blind, Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery and Adjuvant Treatment in Subjects With Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled90ConditionsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaArmsNivolumab, Cisplatin, Paclitaxel, 5Fluorouracil, Esophagectomy (minimally invasive)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

312 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 515 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy plus pembrolizumab for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ACTS-29).Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2026
    Trial
  20. Trial

252 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 16 institutions in 7 countries.

Manish A ShahDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Takashi KojimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Daniel HochhauserDepartment of Oncology, University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Peter EnzingerCenter for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Judith RaimbourgDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, St Herblain, Nantes, France.
Antoine HollebecqueDepartment of Adult Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Florian LordickDepartment of Oncology, Hematology, and Hemostaseology, University Cancer Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Sung-Bae KimDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Masahiro TajikaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Heung Tae KimLung Cancer Branch, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
A Craig LockhartDepartment of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Hendrik-Tobias ArkenauDrug Development Program, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, University College, London, United Kingdom.
Farid El-HajbiDepartment of General Cancer, Centre Oscar-Lambret, Lille, France.
Mukul GuptaDepartment of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Sansum Clinic, Santa Barbara, California.
Per PfeifferDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Qi LiuClinical Research, Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey.
Jared LuncefordClinical Research, Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey.
S Peter KangClinical Research, Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey.
Pooja BhagiaClinical Research, Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey.
Ken KatoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPCentre Oscar Lambret · FRDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRNational Cancer Center · KRNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USOdense University Hospital · DKSansum Medical Clinic · USSarah Cannon Research Institute · GBUlsan College · KRUniversity Cancer Center Hamburg · DEUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceEffective treatment options are limited for patients with advanced, metastatic esophageal cancer progressing after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy.

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab for patients with advanced, metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) or advanced, metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction that progressed after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis phase 2, open-label, interventional, single-arm study, KEYNOTE-180, enrolled 121 patients from January 12, 2016, to March 21, 2017, from 57 sites in 10 countries. Patients had advanced, metastatic esophageal cancer that progressed after 2 or more lines of therapy and had evaluable tumor samples for biomarkers.

interventionsPembrolizumab, 200 mg, was administered intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or study withdrawal, for up to 2 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary end point was objective response rate per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors by central imaging review for all patients.

resultsAs of September 18, 2017, of 121 enrolled patients (100 men and 21 women; median age, 65 years [range, 33-87 years]), 18 (14.9%) had undergone 3 or more prior therapies, 63 (52.1%) had ESCC, and 58 (47.9%) had tumors positive for programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1), defined as a combined positive score of 10 or higher assessed by immunohistochemistry. Median duration of follow-up was 5.8 months (range, 0.2-18.3 months). Objective response rate was 9.9% (95% CI, 5.2%-16.7%) among all patients (12 of 121), and median duration of response was not reached (range, 1.9-14.4 months). Objective response rate was 14.3% (95% CI, 6.7%-25.4%) among patients with ESCC (9 of 63), 5.2% (95% CI, 1.1%-14.4%) among patients with adenocarcinoma (3 of 58), 13.8% (95% CI, 6.1%-25.4%) among patients with PD-L1-positive tumors (8 of 58), and 6.3% (95% CI, 1.8%-15.5%) among patients with PD-L1-negative tumors (4 of 63). Overall, 15 patients (12.4%) had treatment-related grade 3 to 5 adverse events. Only 5 patients (4.1%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events. There was 1 treatment-related death from pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Where effective treatment options are an unmet need, pembrolizumab provided durable antitumor activity with manageable safety in patients with heavily pretreated esophageal cancer. Phase 3 studies evaluating pembrolizumab vs standard therapy for patients with esophageal cancer progressing after first-line therapy or in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic esophageal cancer are ongoing.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02559687.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanpembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID30570649
PMCPMC6459121
OpenAlexW2906166963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.