Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30570029›Full record

Observational studyRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva

An electronic warning system helps reduce the time to diagnosis of sepsis.

Glauco Adrieno Westphal, Aline Braz Pereira, Silvia Maria Fachin, Geonice Sperotto, Maurício Gonçalves, Lucimeri Albino, Rodolfo Bittencourt, Vanessa de Rossi Franzini, Álvaro Koenig

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Glauco Adrieno WestphalCentro Hospitalar Unimed - Joinville (SC), Brasil.
Aline Braz PereiraCentro Hospitalar Unimed - Joinville (SC), Brasil.
Silvia Maria FachinCentro Hospitalar Unimed - Joinville (SC), Brasil.
Geonice SperottoCentro Hospitalar Unimed - Joinville (SC), Brasil.
Maurício GonçalvesCentro Hospitalar Unimed - Joinville (SC), Brasil.
Lucimeri AlbinoCentro Hospitalar Unimed - Joinville (SC), Brasil.
Rodolfo BittencourtCentro Hospitalar Unimed - Joinville (SC), Brasil.
Vanessa de Rossi FranziniCentro Hospitalar Unimed - Joinville (SC), Brasil.
Álvaro KoenigCentro Hospitalar Unimed - Joinville (SC), Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the improvements of an early warning system for the identification of septic patients on the time to diagnosis, antibiotic delivery, and mortality.

methodsThis was an observational cohort study that describes the successive improvements made over a period of 10 years using an early warning system to detect sepsis, including systematic active manual surveillance, electronic alerts via a telephonist, and alerts sent directly to the mobile devices of nurses. For all periods, after an alert was triggered, early treatment was instituted according to the institutional sepsis guidelines.

resultsIn total, 637 patients with sepsis were detected over the study period. The median triage-to-diagnosis time was reduced from 19:20 (9:10 - 38:15) hours to 12:40 (2:50 - 23:45) hours when the manual surveillance method was used (p = 0.14), to 2:10 (1:25 - 2:20) hours when the alert was sent automatically to the hospital telephone service (p = 0.014), and to 1:00 (0:30 - 1:10) hour when the alert was sent directly to the nurse's mobile phone (p = 0.016). The diagnosis-to-antibiotic time was reduced to 1:00 (0:55 - 1:30) hours when the alert was sent to the telephonist and to 0:45 (0:30 - 1:00) minutes when the alert was sent directly to the nurse's mobile phone (p = 0.02), with the maintenance of similar values over the following years. There was no difference in the time of treatment between survivors and non-survivors.

conclusionElectronic systems help reduce the triage-to-diagnosis time and diagnosis-to-antibiotic time in patients with sepsis.

Indexed as

TelephoneAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMalePractice Guidelines as TopicSepsisTime FactorsTriageAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID30570029
PMCPMC6334482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.