Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30569658›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2018

Cervical vagal nerve stimulation impairs glucose tolerance and suppresses insulin release in conscious rats.

Harald M Stauss, Hubert Stangl, Karen C Clark, Anne E Kwitek, Vitor A Lira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Electroceuticals in the Gastrointestinal Tract.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Harald M StaussDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine, Las Cruces, New Mexico.
Hubert StanglLaboratory of Experimental Rheumatology, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Bayern, Germany.
Karen C ClarkDepartment of Pharmacology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Anne E KwitekDepartment of Pharmacology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Vitor A LiraDepartment of Health and Human Physiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
University of Iowa · USUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM008629 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI EBERL, DANIEL F · 1997 to 2021
$4.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously, we reported that cervical vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) increases blood glucose levels and inhibits insulin secretion in anesthetized rats through afferent signaling. Since afferent signaling is also thought to mediate the therapeutic effects of VNS in patients with therapy-refractory epilepsy and major depression, the question arises if patients treated with VNS develop impaired glucose tolerance. Thus, we hypothesized that cervical VNS impairs glucose tolerance in conscious rats. Rats (n = 7) were instrumented with telemetric blood pressure sensors and right- or left-sided cervical vagal nerve stimulators (3 V, 5 Hz, 1 msec pulse duration, 1 h on 1 h off). Glucose tolerance tests (GTTs, 1.5 g dextrose/kg BW, i.p.) were performed after overnight fasting with the stimulators on or off (sham stimulation) in randomized order separated by 3-4 days. Overnight VNS did not alter mean levels of blood pressure or heart rate, but increased fasted blood glucose levels (140 ± 13 mg/dL vs. 109 ± 8 mg/dL, P < 0.05). The area under the blood glucose concentration curves of the GTTs was larger during VNS than sham stimulation (3499 ± 211 mg/dL*h vs. 1810 ± 234 mg/dL*h, P < 0.05). One hour into the GTTs, the serum insulin concentrations had decreased during VNS (-0.57 ± 0.25 ng/mL, P < 0.05) and increased during sham stimulation (+0.71 ± 0.15 ng/mL, P < 0.05) compared to the fasted baseline levels. These results demonstrate that chronic cervical VNS elevates fasted blood glucose levels and impairs glucose tolerance likely through inhibition of glucose-induced insulin release in conscious rats. It remains to be determined if patients treated with VNS are at greater risk of developing glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes.

Indexed as

Insulin SecretionAnimalsBlood GlucoseConsciousnessFemaleGlucose IntoleranceHeart RateMaleRatsVagus NerveBlood GlucoseBlood pressurefasted blood glucoseglucagonglucose tolerance testheart rateheart rate variabilityneuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID30569658
PMCPMC6300710
OpenAlexW2906395795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.