ArticleAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2019
LCR1 and LCR2, two multi-analyte blood tests to assess liver cancer risk in patients without or with cirrhosis.
Article in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01927133 (LIVER FIBROSIS PREVALENCE IN FRANCE), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Liver fibrosis prevalence in france
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of models to predict incident chronic liver disease: a systematic review and external validation in Chinese adults.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Development and validation of machine learning models for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma risk and survival in patients with diabetic cirrhosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Liver cancer risk-predictive molecular biomarkers specific to clinico-epidemiological contexts.Advances in cancer research · 2022Article
- External Validation of LCR1-LCR2, a Multivariable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk Calculator, in a Multiethnic Cohort of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.Gastro hep advances · 2022Article
- External validation of LCR1-LCR2, a multivariable HCC risk calculator, in patients with chronic HCV.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2021Article
- HCC risk prediction using biomarkers in non-cirrhotic patients following HCV eradication: Reassuring the patient or the doctor?JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2021Article
- Review
- Clinical and Molecular Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Input of serum haptoglobin fucosylation profile in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with non-cirrhotic liver disease.Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Patterns of Comorbidity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- LCR1 and LCR2, two multi-analyte blood tests to assess liver cancer risk in patients without or with cirrhosis.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
26 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNo blood test has been shown to be effective in the prediction of primary liver cancer in patients without cirrhosis.
aimTo construct and internally validate two sequential tests for early prediction of liver cancer. These tests enable an algorithm which could improve the performance of the standard surveillance protocol recommended (imaging with or without AFP), limited to patients with cirrhosis.
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis in prospectively collected specimens from an ongoing cohort. We designed an early sensitive high-risk test (LCR1) that combined (using Cox model) hepatoprotective proteins (apolipoproteinA1, haptoglobin) with known risk factors (gender, age, gammaglutamyltranspeptidase), and a marker of fibrosis (alpha2-macroglobulin). To increase the specificity, we then combined (LCR2) these components with alpha-fetoprotein.
resultsA total of 9892 patients, 85.9% without cirrhosis, were followed up for 5.9 years [IQR: 4.3-9.4]. LCR1 and LCR2 time-dependent AUROCs were not different in construction and validation randomised subsets. Among 2027 patients with high-LCR1 then high-LCR2, 167 cancers (113 with cirrhosis, 54 without cirrhosis) were detected, that is 12 patients needed to screen one cancer. The negative predictive value was 99.5% (95% CI 99.0-99.7) in the 2026 not screened patients (11 cancers without cirrhosis) higher than the standard surveillance, which detected 113 cancers in 755 patients screened, that is seven patients needed to screen one cancer, but with a lower negative predictive value 98.0% (97.5-98.5; Z = 4.3; P < 0.001) in 3298 not screened patients (42 cancers without cirrhosis).
conclusionsIn patients with chronic liver disease the LCR1 and LCR2 tests identify those with a high risk of liver cancer, including in those without cirrhosis. NCT01927133.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.