ArticleJournal of neurology2019
Predictors and outcome of status epilepticus in cerebral venous thrombosis.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Seizures as the initial presentation of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in an elderly patient: a case report and literature review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Outcome of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Requiring Mechanical Ventilation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Predictive Value of Combination of D-dimer and Fibrinogen in Diagnosing Acute CVST.Annals of neurosciences · 2021Article
- Case Report: Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis and COVID-19 Infection.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: an Update.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the clinico-radiological characteristics of SE in the patients with cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), and compare the relative risk of SE in determining death and disability compared with those patients with and without self-limiting seizures. Consecutive patients with magnetic resonance venography (MRV) confirmed CVT, admitted during 2006-2017, were included. Their clinical details, risk factors, and magnetic resonance imaging and MRV findings were noted. Duration of SE, Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS), Glasgow Coma Scale score, and response to antiepileptic drugs were noted. 6-month outcomes were noted using the modified Rankin Scale. Of 153 CVT patients, 28 (18.3%) had SE, 62 (40.5%) self-limiting seizures, and 63 (41.2%) did not have seizures or SE. The SE group had a higher incidence of focal motor deficit (71.4% vs. 33%, P = 0.006) and supratentorial lesions (93% vs 55.5%, P = 0.003) than the no-seizure group. Multivariate analysis of SE and no-SE group (includes self-limiting and no seizure) did not indicate any significant predictor, but multivariate analysis of SE and no-seizure group indicated that supratentorial lesion only predicted SE (odds ratio 5.65, 95% confidence interval 1.11-28.76; P = 0.03). Patients with SE and self-limiting seizure had similar clinical and MRI findings. In total, 17.8% had refractory SE; refractoriness was related to the pretreatment duration of SE (P < 0.001). The death and disability were not significantly different between the three groups. At 6 months, 84% patients with SE, 92.3% with self-limiting seizure, and 94.8% in no-seizure group had good recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.