Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30569366›Full record

ReviewTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2019

State-of-the-art and novel developments of in vivo haploid technologies.

Kamila Kalinowska, Sindy Chamas, Katharina Unkel, Dmitri Demidov, Inna Lermontova, Thomas Dresselhaus, Jochen Kumlehn, Frank Dunemann, Andreas Houben

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Advances in Genome Editing Through Haploid Induction Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. In vitro- and in vivo-based approaches for doubled haploid production in Zea mays L.: challenges and opportunities.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Recent Progress on Plant Apomixis for Genetic Improvement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Haploid Induction inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  20. Embryo Rescue in Plant Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kamila KalinowskaBiochemie-Zentrum Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Sindy ChamasLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstraße 3, 06466, Stadt Seeland, Germany.
Katharina UnkelInstitute for Breeding Research on Horticultural Crops, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Erwin-Baur-Str. 27, 06484, Quedlinburg, Germany.
Dmitri DemidovLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstraße 3, 06466, Stadt Seeland, Germany.
Inna LermontovaLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstraße 3, 06466, Stadt Seeland, Germany.
Thomas DresselhausBiochemie-Zentrum Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Universitätsstraße 31, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Jochen KumlehnLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstraße 3, 06466, Stadt Seeland, Germany.
Frank DunemannInstitute for Breeding Research on Horticultural Crops, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kühn-Institute (JKI), Erwin-Baur-Str. 27, 06484, Quedlinburg, Germany.
Andreas HoubenLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstraße 3, 06466, Stadt Seeland, Germany. houben@ipk-gatersleben.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3419-239X

Funding

BMBF HaploToolsBMBF Plant 2030BMBF Project 031B0192NN
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to generate (doubled) haploid plants significantly accelerates the crop breeding process. Haploids have been induced mainly through the generation of plants from cultivated gametophic (haploid) cells and tissues, i.e., in vitro haploid technologies, or through the selective loss of a parental chromosome set upon inter- or intraspecific hybridization. Here, we focus our review on the mechanisms responsible for the in vivo formation of haploids in the context of inter- and intraspecific hybridization. The application of a modified CENH3 for uniparental genome elimination, the IG1 system used for paternal as well as the BBM-like and the patatin-like phospholipase essential for maternal haploidy induction are discussed in detail.

Indexed as

HaploidyCentromereCrops, AgriculturalHybridization, GeneticParthenogenesisPlant Breeding

Identifiers

PMID30569366
PMCPMC6439148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.