Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30569346›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2019

Pain control in laparoscopic surgery: a case-control study between transversus abdominis plane-block and trocar-site anesthesia.

Sarah Molfino, Emanuele Botteri, Paolo Baggi, Luigi Totaro, Michela Huscher, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Nazario Portolani, Nereo Vettoretto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah MolfinoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, Via San Rocchino 199, 25123, Brescia, Italy. sarahmolfino@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-9041
Emanuele BotteriSurgical Unit, Montichiari Hospital, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Paolo BaggiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, Via San Rocchino 199, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Luigi TotaroDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, Via San Rocchino 199, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Michela HuscherIntensive Care Unit, Montichiari Hospital, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Gian Luca BaiocchiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, Via San Rocchino 199, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Nazario PortolaniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, Via San Rocchino 199, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Nereo VettorettoSurgical Unit, Montichiari Hospital, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
University of Brescia · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local anesthesia in laparoscopic operations is gaining increasing consensus. To standardize analgesia, a prospective case-control study was created over a 1-year period, in collaboration with the anesthesiology service in our community hospital. Starting from February 2016, we prospectively enrolled adult patients (more than 16 years old) undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy or cholecystectomy, either in emergency or elective setting. Patients were preoperatively assigned (based on the chart-admission number) either to transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block treatment (Group 1-experimental arm) or trocar-site anesthesia (TSA) (Group 2-experimental arm), and then compared with group of patients not submitted to treatment (Group 3-control arm). Demographic and clinical characteristics of each patient were recorded. Post-operative pain level (primary outcome) was assessed with visual analog scale (VAS) score; analgesic use and length of stay in hospital were defined as secondary outcomes. Forty-two patients were assigned to TAP block treatment (Group 1), fifty-two to TSA (Group 2), and thirty-nine underwent no pre-incisional treatment (Group 3). In the comparison between patients undergoing TAP block or TSA with the control arm, a significance difference in reported pain was recorded in every scheduled time (p < 0.05 at 0, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 h from awakening). Both local anesthesia groups share a benefit in terms of primary outcome. The use of pre-incisional TSA for all the patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and appendectomy could become a routine practice to reduce post-operative pain both in the elective and emergency setting.

Indexed as

Abdominal MusclesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthetics, LocalAppendectomyCase-Control StudiesCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedNerve BlockAnesthetics, LocalLaparoscopic surgeryPain controlPost-operative painTAP blockTrocar-site anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID30569346
OpenAlexW2903600420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.