Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30569275›Full record

SynthesisVeterinary research communications2019

Impacts on performance of growing-finishing pigs under heat stress conditions: a meta-analysis.

Angela Cristina da Fonseca de Oliveira, Karoline Vanelli, Cristina Santos Sotomaior, Saulo Henrique Weber, Leandro Batista Costa

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Veterinary research communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angela Cristina da Fonseca de OliveiraGraduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil. angela.fonseca@pucpr.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0332-7087
Karoline VanelliGraduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil.
Cristina Santos SotomaiorGraduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil.
Saulo Henrique WeberGraduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil.
Leandro Batista CostaGraduate Program in Animal Science, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, 80215-901, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High ambient temperatures are a challenge for animal production around the world, and they are one of the major reasons for economic and productive losses in pig production. Under stress conditions, the energy contribution to productive functions is reduced, generating health imbalances, decreased productivity rates and changes in animal behavior. Despite the numerous articles published on this subject, the variability of results on performance parameters is high. For this reason, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the actual impact of high ambient temperature (HAT) (29 °C to 35 °C) on growing-finishing pig performance, compared with animals kept in a thermoneutral environment (TNT) (18 °C to 25 °C), based on meta-analysis. Data on average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (FI) and feed gain ratio (F:G) were extracted from 22 (n = 22) papers published in scientific journals. The values were analyzed using an expansion of the t-test, considering the random effect of each study. Results showed that HAT reduced the values of ADG (654.38 vs 595.81 g/d) and FI (2.141 vs 1.875 g/d) when compared with the thermoneutral group. There was no statistical difference between the F:G values for both groups. In conclusion, high ambient temperatures negatively influence performance parameters of growing-finishing pigs when compared with those in thermoneutral conditions.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryHeat-Shock ResponseAnimalsSus scrofaAnimal welfareHigh temperaturesSwineThermoneutral conditions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.