ArticleMolecular medicine reports2019
A risk assessment model for the prognosis of osteosarcoma utilizing differentially expressed lncRNAs.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selection of lncRNAs That Influence the Prognosis of Osteosarcoma Based on Copy Number Variation Data.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Silencing long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 00987 inhibits proliferation, migration, and invasion of osteosarcoma cells by sponging miR-376a-5p to regulate FNBP1 expression.Discover oncology · 2021Article
- Identification of Biomarkers for Osteosarcoma Based on Integration Strategy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study was conducted to establish a risk assessment model for evaluating osteosarcoma prognosis based on prognosis-associated long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) expression. Human osteosarcoma expression profiles were obtained from the NCBI GEO and EBI ArrayExpress databases and differently expressed lncRNAs between good and poor prognosis groups were evaluated using Student's t-test and Wilcoxon rank test in R (v. 3.1.0). A multivariate Cox regression was used to establish a risk assessment system based on lncRNA expression levels, with the associated regression coefficients used as the weight. Survival analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to verify the accuracy of the risk assessment model. Associations between the prognosis, risk assessment model and clinical features were also investigated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Furthermore, differentially expressed genes associated with the lncRNAs in the risk assessment model were identified, and functional enrichment analysis was performed. A total of 9 from the 211 differentially expressed lncRNAs were selected to establish the risk assessment model. The risk assessment model exhibited a good prognostic prediction ability, with high area under the curve values in the training and validation sets. Additionally, the calculated risk score based on the 9 selected lncRNAs was identified to be an independent prognostic factor for osteosarcoma. Furthermore, differentially expressed genes were primarily enriched in the cell cycle, oxidative phosphorylation and cell adhesion processes. The present study described a risk assessment model based on 9 significantly differentially expressed lncRNAs, which was identified to have a high accuracy in potentially predicting patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.