Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30568879›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2019

Development of a self-guided web-based intervention to promote physical activity using the multi-process action control framework.

Sam Liu, Casandra Husband, Henry La, Madeline Juba, Raven Loucks, Aimee Harrison, Ryan E Rhodes

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05631587 (A Technology-based Intervention for Promoting Physical Activity Among Post-treatment Cancer Survivors), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05631587 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Technology-based Intervention for Promoting Physical Activity Among Post-treatment Cancer Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2022 to 2024Enrolled98ConditionsCancer, SurvivorshipArmsWExercise, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sam LiuSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Casandra HusbandSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Henry LaSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Madeline JubaSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Raven LoucksSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Aimee HarrisonSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Ryan E RhodesSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
University of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePhysical activity promotion has mostly focused on theories of intention-formation, with the assumption that positive intentions will lead to behaviour. Though necessary, exercise intentions alone are often not sufficient to improve physical activity behaviour. The Multi-Process Action Control (M-PAC) framework builds on previous intention-based theories by including both determinants of intention formation and its translation into behaviour. The purpose of this study was to describe the process of developing a self-guided web-based intervention to promote physical activity among adults using the M-PAC model. PROCEDURES: The development process consisted of the following three phases: 1) Intervention planning: determine intervention needs and requirements; 2) Intervention development: use an iterative process to design a web-based physical activity intervention based on the M-PAC framework; 3) Pilot testing: conduct usability and acceptability assessment on the web-based intervention to further enhance user experience. PRINCIPAL

resultsThe intervention planning phase suggested that there is a need for web-based physical activity interventions and there is currently no web-based intervention designed using the M-PAC model. In phase two, we adopted an iterative process to develop a 10-week self-guided web-based intervention to help adults (>18 years of age) to meet 150 min of moderate to vigorous physical activity per week. The pilot testing phase yielded valuable feedback on usability, content, and design of the web-based intervention. MAJOR

conclusionsThe development of a web-based physical activity intervention using the M-PAC model could further enhance the effectiveness of web-based interventions and have a significant impact on extending the reach of existing physical activity promotion programs. This study has reinforced the importance of an iterative development process that involves a multi-disciplinary team to design a web-based intervention to promote physical activity. The process enabled the team to clarify the needs for an intervention for our target users, and provided valuable feedback on the design and content of the web-based intervention. Future studies are now needed to evaluate the effectiveness of our web-based intervention.

Identifiers

PMID30568879
PMCPMC6290280
OpenAlexW2902860759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.