Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30568836›Full record

ArticleSouthern African journal of HIV medicine2018

Sexual reproductive healthcare utilisation and HIV testing in an integrated adolescent youth centre clinic in Cape Town, South Africa.

Andrea S Mendelsohn, Katherine Gill, Rebecca Marcus, Dante Robbertze, Claudine van de Venter, Eve Mendel, Landisiwe Mzukwa, Linda-Gail Bekker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Southern African journal of HIV medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea S MendelsohnThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3269-0512
Katherine GillThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1367-4309
Rebecca MarcusThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1058-0654
Dante RobbertzeThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7692-3117
Claudine van de VenterThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0513-6823
Eve MendelThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9176-7159
Landisiwe MzukwaThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3092-5923
Linda-Gail BekkerThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0755-4386
Desmond Tutu HIV Foundation · ZAWestern Cape Department of Health · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV prevalence is increasing among South African youth, but HIV counselling and testing (HCT) remains low. Adolescent pregnancy rates are also high.

objectivesInnovative strategies are needed to increase HIV and pregnancy screening and prevention among youth.

methodThe Desmond Tutu HIV Foundation Youth Centre (DTHF-YC) offers integrated, incentivised sexual and reproductive health (SRH), educational and recreational programmes. We compared HCT and contraception rates between the DTHF-YC and a public clinic (PC) in Cape Town to estimate the impact of DTHF-YC on youth contraception and HCT utilisation.

resultsIn 2015, females < 18 years had 3.74 times (confidence interval [CI]: 3.37-4.15) more contraception visits at DTHF-YC versus PC. There were no differences in the contraception and adherence was suboptimal. DTHF-YC youth (aged 15-24 years) were 1.85 times (CI: 1.69-2.01) more likely to undergo HCT versus PC, while male youth were 3.83 times (CI: 3.04-4.81) more likely to test at DTHF-YC. Youth were a third less likely to test HIV-positive at DTHF-YC versus PC. Female sex, older age, clinic attendance for contraception and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), redeeming incentives and high DTHF-YC attendance were all independent factors associated with increased HCT.

conclusionYouth were significantly more likely to access SRH services at DTHF-YC compared with the PC. The differences were greatest in contraception use by female adolescents < 18 years and HCT by male youth. Increased HCT did not increase youth HIV case detection. Data from DTHF-YC suggest that youth-friendly healthcare providers integrated into community youth spaces may increase youth HCT and contraception rates.

Identifiers

PMID30568836
PMCPMC6295754
OpenAlexW2901360567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.