Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30568733›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2018

Comparative transcriptome analyses of oleaginous

Pengfei Cheng, Chengxu Zhou, Yan Wang, Zhihui Xu, Jilin Xu, Dongqing Zhou, Yinghui Zhang, Haizhen Wu, Xuezhi Zhang, Tianzhong Liu and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Advantages of Heterotrophic Microalgae as a Host for Phytochemicals Production.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pengfei Cheng1College of Food and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211 People's Republic of China.
Chengxu Zhou1College of Food and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211 People's Republic of China.
Yan Wang1College of Food and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211 People's Republic of China.
Zhihui Xu1College of Food and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211 People's Republic of China.
Jilin Xu1College of Food and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211 People's Republic of China.
Dongqing Zhou2State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai, 200237 People's Republic of China.
Yinghui Zhang2State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai, 200237 People's Republic of China.
Haizhen Wu2State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai, 200237 People's Republic of China.
Xuezhi Zhang4Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, 430072 People's Republic of China.
Tianzhong Liu5Key Laboratory of Biofuels, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, 266101 People's Republic of China.
Ming Tang6Poyang Lake Eco-economy Research Center, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang, 332000 People's Republic of China.
Qiyong Yang6Poyang Lake Eco-economy Research Center, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang, 332000 People's Republic of China.
Xiaojun Yan7Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology of Zhejiang Province, Ningbo University, 818 Fenghua Road, Ningbo, 315211 People's Republic of China.
Jianhua Fan2State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, 130 Meilong Road, Shanghai, 200237 People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-2058-5451
Ningbo University · CNEast China University of Science and Technology · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNJiujiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background

resultsGrowth curves were similar at either normal or high cobalt concentration (4.5 mg/L), suggesting the absence of obvious deleterious effects on growth introduced by cobalt. Photosynthesis indicators (decline in Fv/Fm ratio and chlorophyll content) and reactive oxygen species parameters revealed an increase in physiological stress in the high cobalt concentration. Moreover, cobalt enrichment treatment resulted in higher crude hydrocarbon content (51.3% on day 8) compared with the control (43.4% on day 8) throughout the experiment (with 18.2% improvement finally). Through the de novo assembly and functional annotation of the

conclusions

Indexed as

Botryococcus brauniiCobalt treatmentPhysiological responseRegulation mechanismTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID30568733
PMCPMC6297975
OpenAlexW2905392121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.