Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30568472›Full record

ReviewDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2018

TNM cancer staging: can it help develop a novel staging system for type 2 diabetes?

Moahad S Dar, Sami A Bég

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06142006 (A Pilot Study to Test the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Novel Diabetes Staging System in Patient Aligned Care Teams in the Durham VA System), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06142006 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Study to Test the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Novel Diabetes Staging System in Patient Aligned Care Teams in the Durham VA System

TypeobservationalSponsorDurham VA Medical CenterRan2023 to 2025Enrolled120ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 DiabetesArmsDiabetes Staging System (DSS) use among Primary Care Teams
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Moahad S DarDepartment of Veteran Affairs, Greenville Health Care Center, Greenville, NC, USA, moahad.dar@va.gov.
Sami A BégProactive Living Inc., Columbia, SC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes (DM2) constitutes 90%-95% of the diabetes cases and is increasing at an alarming rate in the world. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that more than 29 million people in the United States have diabetes, which often causes mortality from macrovascular complications and morbidity from microvascular complications. Despite these troubling facts, there is currently no widely accepted staging system for DM2 like there is for cancer. TNM oncologic staging has taken a complex condition like cancer and conveyed likelihood of survival in simple alpha-numeric terms that both patients and providers can understand. Oncology is now entering the era of precision medicine where cancer treatment is increasingly being tailored to each patient's cancer. In contrast, DM2 lacks a staging system and remains a largely invisible disease even though it kills more Americans and costs more to treat than cancer. Is a comparable staging system for DM2 possible? We propose the Diabetes Staging System for DM2 that utilizes macrovascular events, microvascular complications, estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and hemoglobin A1C to stage DM2.

Indexed as

GFRglomerular filtration ratehemoglobin A1Cmacrovascular complicationsmicrovascular complicationsTNM cancer stagingtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID30568472
PMCPMC6276824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.