Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30568295›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Ant-plant sociometry in the Azteca-Cecropia mutualism.

Peter R Marting, Nicole M Kallman, William T Wcislo, Stephen C Pratt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. On the move: sloths and their epibionts as model mobile ecosystems.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter R MartingSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA. pmarting@asu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9096-8186
Nicole M KallmanSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.
William T WcisloSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Panama.
Stephen C PrattSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85281, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1086-4019
Arizona State University · USSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute · PA

Funding

ASU | School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University (ASU School of Life Sciences) NANational Science Foundation (NSF) CCF-1012029Smithsonian | Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (Smithsonian Tropical Research Institution) NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A holistic understanding of superorganism biology requires study of colony sociometry, or the quantitative relationships among growth, nest architecture, morphology, and behavior. For ant colonies that obligately nest within plant hosts, their sociometry is likely intertwined with the plant, which has implications for the evolution, strength, and stability of the mutualism. In the Azteca-Cecropia mutualism, plants provide ants with food rewards and hollow stems for nesting in return for protection from herbivores. Several interesting questions arise when considering ant-plant sociometry: are colony growth and plant growth synchronized? How do colonies distribute themselves within the stem of their host plant? How do plant traits influence worker morphology? How is collective personality related to tree structure, nest organization, and worker morphology? To address these questions, we investigated patterns within and relationships among five major sociometric categories of colonies in the field - plant traits, colony size, nest organization, worker morphology, and collective personality. We found that colony sociometry was intimately intertwined with host plant traits. Colony and plant growth rates were synchronized, suggesting that positive feedback between plant and colony growth stabilizes the mutualism. The colony's distribution inside the host tree tended to follow leaf growth, with most workers, brood, and the queen in the top half of the tree. Worker morphology correlated with plant size instead of colony size or age, which suggests that plant traits influence worker development. Colony personality was independent of colony distribution and tree structure but may correlate with worker size such that colonies with smaller, less variable workers had more aggressive personalities. This study provides insights into how ant-plant structural relationships may contribute to plant protection and the strength of mutualisms.

Indexed as

AntsPlantsSymbiosisAnimalsNesting BehaviorPopulation DensityQuantitative Trait, HeritableSociometric TechniquesTrees

Identifiers

PMID30568295
PMCPMC6299286
OpenAlexW2905484854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.