ArticleNature reviews. Nephrology2019
Publisher Correction: The evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: a consensus report of the International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group.
Article in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intratubular light chain amyloidosis: a comprehensive analysis of disease spectrum and clinicopathological characteristics.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Laboratory and Clinical Settings of Heavy/Light Chain (HLC) Assays in the Management of Monoclonal Gammopathies and Multiple Myeloma.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal IgG deposits: a unique case with a clinical course of over 46 years.BMC nephrology · 2023Article
- Immunoglobulin M Paraproteinaemias.Cancers · 2020Review
- Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS)-Not So Asymptomatic after All.Cancers · 2020Review
- Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with deposition of monoclonal IgG evolved from polyclonal IgG: a case report with two consecutive renal biopsies.BMC nephrology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the key to Figure 1 of this article, 'Amyloid microtubules' has been corrected to 'Microtubules'.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.