ArticleOncogene2019
Impact of RAS mutation subtype on clinical outcome-a cross-entity comparison of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer.
Article in Oncogene, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic and therapeutic roles of specific genotypes through target-gene sequencing on gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma.The oncologist · 2026Article
- SETD2 suppresses tumorigenesis in a KRASeLife · 2025Article
- The Pharmacologic Inhibition of KRAS Mutants as a Treatment for Cancer: Therapeutic Principles and Clinical Results.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Review
- Therapeutic strategies for KRAS G12C-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: from bench to bedside and beyond.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Prognostic value of the non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (NHHR) in patients with RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Targeting KRASDrugs · 2024Review
- RAF and MEK Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The Potential Treatment Options and Combination Strategies of KRAS-Mutated Lung Cancer.OncoTargets and therapy · 2024Review
- Acquired resistance to KRAS G12C small-molecule inhibitors via genetic/nongenetic mechanisms in lung cancer.Science advances · 2023Article
- Multi-omics profiling reveals cellular pathways and functions regulated by ALDH1B1 in colon cancer cells.Chemico-biological interactions · 2023Article
- Prognostic Role ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review
- The Next Generation of KRAS Targeting: Reasons for Excitement and Concern.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2022Review
- Combinatorial approaches for mitigating resistance to KRAS-targeted therapies.The Biochemical journal · 2022Article
- RAS oncogenic activity predicts response to chemotherapy and outcome in lung adenocarcinoma.Nature communications · 2022Article
- The Effect of the Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog (Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers · 2022Article
- A KRAS-Associated Signature for Prognostic, Immune and Chemical Anti-Cancer Drug-Response Prediction in Colon Cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Characterizing theTherapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022Article
- Targeting Mutated KRAS Genes to Treat Solid Tumours.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2022Review
- KRAS G12 isoforms exert influence over up-front treatments: A retrospective, multicenter, Italian analysis of the impact of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in an NSCLC real-life population.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mutated RAS onco-proteins are key drivers across many cancers. The distribution of somatic RAS mutations varies between cancer entities. Retrospective analyses have associated some RAS mutations with distinct clinical outcomes. However, the clinical impact of the full spectrum of RAS mutations in their disease contextuality remains to be defined. To improve upon this situation, we studied genomically and clinically annotated, prospectively recruited cohorts of patients with RAS-mutated metastatic lung cancer and colorectal cancer. Mutational spectra were compared with predictions derived from analyzing the mutagenic impact at the genome level for each entity. Interestingly, we found concordance of predicted signatures with those actually observed in our patients. Thus, composition of the functionally active RAS mutational subtypes is primarily determined by the mutagenic context. Most RAS mutations seemed dominant oncogenic drivers with entity-dependent clinical outcomes. RAS comutations were enriched in tumors harboring class 2/3 BRAF mutations, highlighting the functional dependency of some mutated BRAF isoforms on RAS. With our dataset, we established a probabilistic model for cross-entity comparison of the prognostic impact of specific RAS mutational subtypes. The resulting prognostic clusters showed largely consistent clinical categorizations in both entities. This suggests mutant subtype-specific functional properties leading to similar clinical effects. A notable exception is KRAS G12C, which imparted an adverse prognosis only in colorectal cancer. Our findings provide a framework for risk stratification of specific RAS mutations across several cancer entities, which is required to guide the analysis of clinical findings in patients treated with direct RAS inhibitors or agents targeting downstream pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.