Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30567826›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Cast versus functional brace in the rehabilitation of patients treated for an ankle fracture: protocol for the UK study of ankle injury rehabilitation (AIR) multicentre randomised trial.

Rebecca Samantha Kearney, Rebecca McKeown, Siobhan Stevens, Nicholas Parsons, Helen Parsons, Philip Wells, Jaclyn Brown, Martin Underwood, Anthony Redmond, James Mason and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rehabilitation for ankle fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Cast versus removable orthosis for the management of stable type B ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca Samantha KearneyWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Rebecca McKeownWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Siobhan StevensWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Nicholas ParsonsWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Helen ParsonsWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Philip WellsWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Jaclyn BrownWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Martin UnderwoodWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Anthony RedmondLeeds Institute of Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK.
James MasonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Matthew L CostaOrthopaedic Trauma, Oxford University, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
University of Warwick · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2016-09-009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEach year in the UK over 120 000 people fracture their ankle. It is not known what the best rehabilitation strategy is for these people. Traditionally standard care has involved immobilisation in a plaster cast but an alternative is a functional brace, which can be removed to allow early movement. This paper details the protocol for a multicentre randomised trial of plaster cast immobilisation versus functional bracing for patients with an ankle fracture. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will recruit adults with a fractured ankle, for which the treating clinician would consider plaster cast to be a reasonable management option. Randomisation will be on a 1:1 basis, stratified by centre, operative or non-operative management and age. Participants will be allocated to either plaster cast or a functional brace, both treatments are widely used. To have 90% power to detect a difference of 10 points on the primary outcome (Olerud and Molander Ankle Score) at the primary outcome time point (16 weeks), we need to randomise a minimum of 478 people. Quality of life and resource use will be collected at 6, 10, 16, 24 weeks and 12, 18, 24 months. The differences between treatment groups will be assessed on an intention-to-treat basis. The economic evaluation will adhere to the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence reference case. ETHICS, REGISTRATION AND DISSEMINATION: National Research Ethic Committee approved this study on 4 July 2017 (17/WM/0239). The first site opened to recruitment 9 October 2017. The results of this trial will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and will inform clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15537280; Pre-results.

Indexed as

BracesCasts, SurgicalQuality of LifeAnkle FracturesAnkle InjuriesCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansLinear ModelsMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRange of Motion, ArticularSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdomadult orthopaedicsrehabilitation medicine

Identifiers

PMID30567826
PMCPMC6303686
OpenAlexW2905240625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.