ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2019
Public Health Efforts Can Impact Adoption of Current Susceptibility Breakpoints, but Closer Attention from Regulatory Bodies Is Needed.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heteroresistance to piperacillin/tazobactam inJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024Article
- A Multicenter Comparison of Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Rates in the US (2016 to 2020): Facility-Reported Rates versus Rates Based on Updated Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute Breakpoints.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- The Practical Problem With Carbapenem Testing and Reporting Accurate Bacterial Susceptibilities.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- CON: Testing for ESBL production is unnecessary for ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2021Article
- Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2021Review
- Breakpoint beware: reliance on historical breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae leads to discrepancies in interpretation of susceptibility testing for carbapenems and cephalosporins and gaps in detection of carbapenem-resistant organisms.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020Article
- Antibiotic Breakpoints: How Redefining Susceptibility Preserves Efficacy and Improves Patient Care.P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management · 2019Article
- CIM City: the Game Continues for a Better Carbapenemase Test.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Article
- Understanding and Addressing CLSI Breakpoint Revisions: a Primer for Clinical Laboratories.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbiological testing, including interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing results using current breakpoints, is crucial for clinical care and infection control. Continued use of obsolete
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.