Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30567688›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2018

Innovating From Within: A Process Model for User-Centered Digital Development in Academic Medical Centers.

Sara Kuppin Chokshi, Devin M Mann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sara Kuppin Chokshi *Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3952-6654
Devin M Mann *Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2099-0852

Funding

Integrated Clinical Prediction Rules: Bringing Evidence to Diverse Primary Care SettingsR01AI108680 · NIAID · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FELDSTEIN, DAVID ALAN, MANN, DEVIN M · 2014 to 2024
$7.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI108680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDesign thinking and human-centered design approaches have become increasingly common in health care literature, particularly in relation to health information technology (HIT), as a pathway toward the development of usable, diffusible tools and processes. There is a need in academic medical centers tasked with digital innovation for a comprehensive process model to guide development that incorporates current industry trends, including design thinking and lean and agile approaches to digital development.

objectiveThis study aims to describe the foundations and phases of our model for user-centered HIT development.

methodsBased on our experience, we established an integrated approach and rigorous process for HIT development that leverages design thinking and lean and agile strategies in a pragmatic way while preserving methodological integrity in support of academic research goals.

resultsA four-phased pragmatic process model was developed for user-centered digital development in HIT.

conclusionsThe model for user-centered HIT development that we developed is the culmination of diverse innovation projects and represents a multiphased, high-fidelity process for making more creative, flexible, efficient, and effective tools. This model is a critical step in building a rigorous approach to HIT design that incorporates a multidisciplinary, pragmatic perspective combined with academic research practices and state-of-the-art approaches to digital product development to meet the unique needs of health care.

Indexed as

academic medical centersdigital healthheath information technologyinnovationprocess modeluser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID30567688
PMCPMC6315266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.