Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30567572›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2018

Dynamic changes in injured myocardium, very early after acute myocardial infarction, quantified using T1 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Mohammad Alkhalil, Alessandra Borlotti, Giovanni Luigi De Maria, Lisa Gaughran, Jeremy Langrish, Andrew Lucking, Vanessa Ferreira, Rajesh K Kharbanda, Adrian P Banning, Keith M Channon and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Cangrelor versus crushed ticagrelor in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: rationale and design of the randomised, double-blind DAPT-SHOCK-AMI trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Imaging of heart disease in women: review and case presentation.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance characteristics and dynamic changes in myocardial and skeletal muscles in idiopathic inflammatory cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2020
    Observational
  15. Review
  16. Hyper-acute cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 mapping predicts infarct characteristics in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2020
    Article
  17. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
  19. The severity of post-infarction edema suggests a bimodal pattern, whereas the extent does not.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammad AlkhalilAcute Vascular Imaging Centre, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3088-8878
Alessandra BorlottiAcute Vascular Imaging Centre, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Giovanni Luigi De MariaOxford Heart Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Lisa GaughranAcute Vascular Imaging Centre, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jeremy LangrishOxford Heart Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Andrew LuckingOxford Heart Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Vanessa FerreiraDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research (OCMR), Oxford, UK.
Rajesh K KharbandaOxford Heart Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Adrian P BanningOxford Heart Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Keith M ChannonOxford Heart Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Erica Dall'ArmellinaAcute Vascular Imaging Centre, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Robin P ChoudhuryAcute Vascular Imaging Centre, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. robin.choudhury@cardiov.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/13/71/30378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt has recently been suggested that myocardial oedema follows a bimodal pattern early post ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Yet, water content, quantified using tissue desiccation, did not return to normal values unlike oedema quantified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. We studied the temporal changes in the extent and intensity of injured myocardium using T1-mapping technique within the first week after STEMI.

methodsA first group (n = 31) underwent 3 acute 3 T CMR scans (time-point (TP) < 3 h, 24 h and 6 days), including cine, native shortened modified look-locker inversion recovery T1 mapping, T2* mapping and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). A second group (n = 17) had a single scan at 24 h with an additional T2-weighted sequence to assess the difference in the extent of area-at-risk (AAR) compared to T1-mapping.

resultsThe mean T1 relaxation time value within the AAR of the first group was reduced after 24 h (P < 0.001 for TP1 vs.TP2) and subsequently increased at 6 days (P = 0.041 for TP2 vs.TP3). However, the extent of AAR quantified using T1-mapping did not follow the same course, and no change was detected between TP1&TP2 (P = 1.0) but was between TP2 &TP3 (P = 0.019). In the second group, the extent of AAR was significantly larger on T1-mapping compared to T2-weighted (42 ± 15% vs. 39 ± 15%, P = 0.025). No change in LGE was detected while microvascular obstruction and intra-myocardial haemorrhage peaked at different time points within the first week of reperfusion.

conclusionThe intensity of oedema post-STEMI followed a bimodal pattern; while the extent of AAR did not track the same course. This discrepancy has implications for use of CMR in this context and may explain the previously reported disagreement between oedema quantified by imaging and tissue desiccation.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, CineAgedContrast MediaEdema, CardiacFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMeglumineMiddle AgedMyocardiumOrganometallic CompoundsPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionTime FactorsContrast Mediagadoterate meglumineMeglumineOrganometallic CompoundsArea at riskSTEMIT1-mapping

Identifiers

PMID30567572
PMCPMC6300907
OpenAlexW2902296094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.