Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30567492›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

Measures of co-expression for improved function prediction of long non-coding RNAs.

Rezvan Ehsani, Finn Drabløs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rezvan EhsaniDepartment of Mathematics, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran. rezvanehsani74@gmail.com.
Finn DrabløsDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491, Trondheim, Norway. finn.drablos@ntnu.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5794-828X

Funding

NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology -University of Zabol -
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlmost 16,000 human long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) genes have been identified in the GENCODE project. However, the function of most of them remains to be discovered. The function of lncRNAs and other novel genes can be predicted by identifying significantly enriched annotation terms in already annotated genes that are co-expressed with the lncRNAs. However, such approaches are sensitive to the methods that are used to estimate the level of co-expression.

resultsWe have tested and compared two well-known statistical metrics (Pearson and Spearman) and two geometrical metrics (Sobolev and Fisher) for identification of the co-expressed genes, using experimental expression data across 19 normal human tissues. We have also used a benchmarking approach based on semantic similarity to evaluate how well these methods are able to predict annotation terms, using a well-annotated set of protein-coding genes.

conclusionThis work shows that geometrical metrics, in particular in combination with the statistical metrics, will predict annotation terms more efficiently than traditional approaches. Tests on selected lncRNAs confirm that it is possible to predict the function of these genes given a reliable set of expression data. The software used for this investigation is freely available.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationMolecular Sequence AnnotationSoftwareComputational BiologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, Long NoncodingCo-expressionFisher information metricFunction predictionGene annotationSobolev metric, semantic similarity

Identifiers

PMID30567492
PMCPMC6300029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.