Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30567392›Full record

ArticleGenes2018

Fragmented Nuclear DNA is the Predominant Genetic Material in Human Hair Shafts.

Michael D Brandhagen, Odile Loreille, Jodi A Irwin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Human hair as a diagnostic tool in medicine.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Record-matching of STR profiles with fragmentary genomic SNP data.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. DNA and protein analyses of hair in forensic genetics.International journal of legal medicine · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Interpol review of forensic biology and forensic DNA typing 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael D BrandhagenDNA Support Unit, FBI Laboratory, 2501 Investigation Parkway, Quantico, VA 22135, USA. mdbrandhagen@fbi.gov.
Odile LoreilleDNA Support Unit, FBI Laboratory, 2501 Investigation Parkway, Quantico, VA 22135, USA. oploreille@fbi.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-7437-7298
Jodi A IrwinDNA Support Unit, FBI Laboratory, 2501 Investigation Parkway, Quantico, VA 22135, USA. jairwin@fbi.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While shed hairs are one of the most commonly encountered evidence types, they are among the most limited in terms of DNA quantity and quality. As a result, nuclear DNA short tandem repeat (STR) profiling is generally unsuccessful and DNA testing of shed hair is instead performed by targeting the mitochondrial DNA control region. Although the high copy number of mitochondrial DNA relative to nuclear DNA routinely permits the recovery of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) data in these cases, mtDNA profiles do not offer the discriminatory power of nuclear DNA profiles. In order to better understand the total content and degradation state of DNA in single shed hairs and assess the feasibility of recovering highly discriminatory nuclear DNA data from this common evidence type, high throughput shotgun sequencing was performed on both recently collected and aged (approximately 50-year-old) hair samples. The data reflect trends that have been demonstrated previously with other technologies, namely that mtDNA quantity and quality decrease along the length of the hair shaft. In addition, the shotgun data reveal that nuclear DNA is present in shed hair and surprisingly abundant relative to mitochondrial DNA, even in the most distal fragments. Nuclear DNA comprised, at minimum, 88% of the total human reads in any given sample, and generally more than 95%. Here, we characterize both the nuclear and mitochondrial DNA content of shed hairs and discuss the implications of these data for forensic investigations.

Indexed as

hair shaftmitochondrial DNAmtDNAmtGenomenext-generation sequencingnuclear DNA

Identifiers

PMID30567392
PMCPMC6316335
OpenAlexW2903656125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.