ArticleBMJ case reports2018
Acute dyskinesia in a patient with schizophrenia.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A case of acute dyskinesia in a 42-year-old man with a history of cocaine use and schizophrenia is described. He had discontinued clozapine approximately 1 month before presenting to the emergency department displaying signs of psychosis, with generalised choreiform and dystonic movements. Urinary toxicology was positive for cocaine. Clozapine treatment was reinitiated, and within 2 weeks the dyskinesia had subsided. Review of his records revealed two previous episodes of similar dyskinesia, both of which were temporally associated with cocaine use. Dyskinesia occurring in the context of cocaine use, and clozapine withdrawal-associated dyskinesia were considered to be the main differential diagnoses. A range of differential diagnoses should be considered in patients presenting with an acute-onset movement disorder who have a history of long-term exposure to antipsychotic medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.