ArticleBMJ case reports2018
Article in BMJ case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fungal keratitis complicating the diagnosis ofMedical mycology case reports · 2025Article
- Treating Pythiosis with Antibacterial Drugs Targeting Protein Synthesis: An Overview.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- New Frontiers inBiology · 2023Review
- Experimental Induction of Acute Acanthamoeba castellanii Keratitis in Cats.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Outcomes of Pythium keratitis: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.Current ophthalmology reports · 2022Article
- Pythium insidiosum Keratitis: Past, Present, and Future.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2022Review
- Review
- Global Distribution and Clinical Features of Pythiosis in Humans and Animals.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Pythium insidiosum keratitis reported in China, raising the alertness to this fungus-like infection: a case series.Journal of medical case reports · 2021Article
- History and Perspective of Immunotherapy for Pythiosis.Vaccines · 2021Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The oomycete
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.