Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30567078›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2018

Gastric schwannoma: report of two cases and review of the literature.

Daniel Paramythiotis, Anestis Karakatsanis, Diamantoula Pagkou, Petros Bangeas, Niki Mantha, Sofia Lypiridou, Antonis Michalopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. What About Gastric Schwannoma? A Review Article.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Laparoscopic resection of gastric schwannoma: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel Paramythiotis1st Propaedeutic Surgery Department, AHEPA University Hospital of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Anestis Karakatsanis1st Propaedeutic Surgery Department, AHEPA University Hospital of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Diamantoula Pagkou1st Propaedeutic Surgery Department, AHEPA University Hospital of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Petros Bangeas1st Propaedeutic Surgery Department, AHEPA University Hospital of Thessaloniki, Greece. Electronic address: pbangeas@gmail.com.
Niki ManthaPathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Sofia LypiridouPathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Antonis Michalopoulos1st Propaedeutic Surgery Department, AHEPA University Hospital of Thessaloniki, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGastrointestinal schwannomas are benign, slow-growing and usually asymptomatic tumors. In some cases bleeding, epigastric pain and palpable mass may be occurring. Preoperative diagnosis is challenging due to the difficulty of differentiation from other submucosal tumors. Diagnosis is most often provided through the histology report. CASE PRESENTATION: In this study we report two cases of gastric tumors with the suspicion of a GIST preoperatively but histologically confirmed to be gastric schwannomas. Two patients of our study gave to us their written consent for publication. Research work has been reported with the PROCESS criteria. DISCUSSION: Surgical resection should be considered the mainstay of treatment in patients with gastric schwannomas. Possible complications such as bleeding or pyloric stenosis can be presented. The size and location of the tumor, as well as its relation to the surrounding organs, are essential factors in determining the type of resection.

conclusionGastric schwannomas are usually presented us submucosal mass. Preoperative diagnosis is challenging due to the difficulty of differentiation from other submucosal tumors. Endoscopic Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsy and endoscopic ultrasound is essential to determine the nature of these lesions. Resection of the lesion in healthy borders is the treatment of choice. Patho-logical examination usually revealed positive S-100 protein and negative CD34, CD117, Actin and desmin strains.

Indexed as

Gastric schwannomasGistNeoplasmsSubmucosal

Identifiers

PMID30567078
PMCPMC6279989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.