ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2018
A rare case of for synchronous advanced cancer of ascending colon and urinary bladder with simultaneous laparoscopic resection: A case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAdvances in diagnostic techniques have resulted in an increase in the diagnosis of numerous patients with multiple primary cancers. However, the diagnosis of synchronous primary colorectal cancer and bladder cancer remains rare. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 69-year-old man diagnosed with synchronous advanced cancer of the ascending colon and urinary bladder underwent simultaneous laparoscopic resection. His postoperative course was similar to that of routine colorectal cancer. The patient refused adjuvant therapy. The patient was diagnosed as having recurrence of bladder cancer 3 months after surgery; he died 9 months after surgery. DISCUSSION: For multiple primary malignant tumors, simultaneous tumor resection is preferred. Simultaneous laparoscopic resection may be proposed for postoperative multidisciplinary treatment. If an established regimen is determined in the future, neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be an option for the treatment of synchronous advanced cancer.
conclusionSimultaneous laparoscopic surgery is a greatly beneficial approach for synchronous cancer requiring multidisciplinary treatment. Additionally, an appropriate support system for patients is indispensable for completing multidisciplinary treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.