Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30567055›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2018

Facing the faceless patients - the emerging challenges of identity fraud in general surgery: A case series.

Jason Cui, Rasika Hendahewa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jason CuiGeneral Surgical Department, Caboolture Hospital, Caboolture, QLD, 4510, Australia. Electronic address: jason.cui@health.qld.gov.au.
Rasika HendahewaGeneral Surgical Department, Caboolture Hospital, Caboolture, QLD, 4510, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis case series highlights the challenges faced in general surgery when encountering patients who use multiple false identities and provide unreliable histories. PRESENTATION OF CASES: We present two patients both with a background of mental health disorders and previous abdominal surgeries. After extensive workup with one patient almost proceeding to surgery, it was noted that these patients have had multiple presentations under different aliases to multiple different hospitals and had given inconsistent medical and surgical histories. DISCUSSION: In such patients, history and clinical examinations are unreliable. Medical records are also not helpful given the patients' multiple aliases. Particularly in surgery, inaccurate knowledge of the patients' previous operative details can lead to significant harms. Extensive investigations are usually performed in assessing these patients, resulting in excessive radiation exposure and incurring significant costs to the health system. It is also important to recognise the potential legal repercussions and harms to the patients who have had their identities stolen.

conclusionIdentity fraud poses significant challenges to patient care, vigilance from clinicians and implementing strategies to reduce system error can help to limit harms to the patient and the health care system.

Indexed as

General surgeryHealth care systemIdentity fraudLaparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID30567055
PMCPMC6260447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.