Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30566527›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Cost-effectiveness of treatments for non-osteoarthritic knee pain conditions: A systematic review.

Tamana Afzali, Mia Vicki Fangel, Anne Sig Vestergaard, Michael Skovdal Rathleff, Lars Holger Ehlers, Martin Bach Jensen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Health-economic evaluation of meniscus tear treatments: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. "Cost-effectiveness of ACL treatment is dependent on age and activity level: a systematic review".Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Trends and Themes in the Study of Value in Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Molecular Detection of a PathogenicPolish journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Association between knee symptoms, change in knee symptoms over 6-9 years, and SF-6D health state utility among middle-aged Australians.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tamana AfzaliCenter for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8347-9878
Mia Vicki FangelDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Anne Sig VestergaardDanish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Department of Business and Management, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Michael Skovdal RathleffCenter for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Lars Holger EhlersDanish Center for Healthcare Improvements, Department of Business and Management, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Martin Bach JensenCenter for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2162-7390

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionKnee pain is common in adolescents and adults and is associated with an increased risk of developing knee osteoarthritis. The aim of this systematic review was to gather and appraise the cost-effectiveness of treatment approaches for non-osteoarthritic knee pain conditions.

methodA systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42016050683). The literature search was done in MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database. Study selection was carried out by two independent reviewers and data were extracted using a customized extraction form. Study quality was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list.

resultsFifteen studies were included. The majority regarded the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, but we also identified studies evaluating other knee pain conditions such as meniscus injuries, cartilage defects, and patellofemoral pain syndrome. Study interventions were categorized as surgical or non-surgical interventions. The surgical interventions included ACL reconstruction, chondrocyte implantation, meniscus scaffold procedure, meniscal allograft transplantation, partial meniscectomy, microfracture, and different types of autografts and allografts. The non-surgical management consisted of physical therapy, rehabilitation, exercise, counselling, bracing, and advice. In general, for ACL injuries surgical management alone or in combination with rehabilitation appeared to be cost-effective. The quality of the economic evaluations was of moderate to high quality.

conclusionThere was insufficient evidence to give a firm overview of cost-effective interventions for non-osteoarthritic knee pain, but surgical treatment of acute ACL injury appeared cost-effective. There is very little data regarding the cost-effectiveness of non-surgical interventions for non-traumatic knee conditions.

Indexed as

ArthralgiaCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansKnee Joint

Identifiers

PMID30566527
PMCPMC6300294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.