Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30566504›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Strain specific differences in rates of Photosystem II repair in picocyanobacteria correlate to differences in FtsH protein levels and isoform expression patterns.

Erin M Bonisteel, Brooke E Turner, Cole D Murphy, Jenna-Rose Melanson, Nicole M Duff, Brian D Beardsall, Kui Xu, Douglas A Campbell, Amanda M Cockshutt

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A novel chlorophyll protein complex in the repair cycle of photosystem II.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Erin M BonisteelDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
Brooke E TurnerDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
Cole D MurphyDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
Jenna-Rose MelansonDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
Nicole M DuffDepartment of Biology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
Brian D BeardsallDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
Kui XuDepartment of Biology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
Douglas A CampbellDepartment of Biology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
Amanda M CockshuttDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3024-2687
Mount Allison University · CASun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Picocyanobacteria are the numerically dominant photoautotrophs of the oligotrophic regions of Earth's oceans. These organisms are characterized by their small size and highly reduced genomes. Strains partition to different light intensity and nutrient level niches, with differing photosynthetic apparatus stoichiometry, light harvesting machinery and susceptibility to photoinactivation. In this study, we grew three strains of picocyanobacteria: the low light, high nutrient strain Prochlorococcus marinus MIT 9313; the high light, low nutrient Prochlorococcus marinus MED 4; and the high light, high nutrient marine Synechococcus strain WH 8102; under low and high growth light levels. We then performed matched photophysiology, protein and transcript analyses. The strains differ significantly in their rates of Photosystem II repair under high light and in their capacity to remove the PsbA protein as the first step in the Photosystem II repair process. Notably, all strains remove the PsbD subunit at the same rate that they remove PsbA. When grown under low light, MIT 9313 loses active Photosystem II quickly when shifted to high light, but has no measurable capacity to remove PsbA. MED 4 and WH 8102 show less rapid loss of Photosystem II and considerable capacity to remove PsbA. MIT 9313 has less of the FtsH protease thought to be responsible for the removal of PsbA in other cyanobacteria. Furthermore, by transcript analysis the predominant FtsH isoform expressed in MIT 9313 is homologous to the FtsH 4 isoform characterized in the model strain Synechocystis PCC 6803, rather than the FtsH 2 and 3 isoforms thought to be responsible for PsbA degradation. MED 4 on the other hand shows high light inducible expression of the isoforms homologous to FtsH 2 and 3, consistent with its faster rate of PsbA removal. MIT 9313 has adapted to its low light environment by diverting resources away from Photosystem II content and repair.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalBacterial ProteinsComputational BiologyGene ExpressionLightOxygenPhotosynthesisPhotosystem II Protein ComplexPhylogenyProchlorococcusProtein IsoformsSpecies SpecificitySynechococcusBacterial ProteinsOxygenPhotosystem II Protein ComplexProtein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID30566504
PMCPMC6300248
OpenAlexW2904642966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.