ArticlePloS one2018
Elevation in lung volume and preventing catastrophic airway closure in asthmatics during bronchoconstriction.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAsthma exacerbations cause lung hyperinflation, elevation in load to inspiratory muscles, and decreased breathing capacity that, in severe cases, may lead to inspiratory muscle fatigue and respiratory failure. Hyperinflation has been attributed to a passive mechanical origin; a respiratory system time-constant too long for full exhalation. However, because the increase in volume is also concurrent with activation of inspiratory muscles during exhalation it is unclear whether hyperinflation in broncho-constriction is a passive phenomenon or is actively controlled to avoid airway closure.
methodsUsing CT scanning, we measured the distensibility of individual segmental airways relative to that of their surrounding parenchyma in seven subjects with asthma and nine healthy controls. With this data we tested whether the elevation of lung volume measured after methacholine (MCh) provocation was associated with airway narrowing, or to the volume required to preventing airway closure. We also tested whether the reduction in FVC post-MCh could be attributed to gas trapped behind closed segmental airways.
findingsThe changes in lung volume by MCh in subjects with and without asthma were inversely associated with their reduction in average airway lumen. This finding would be inconsistent with hyperinflation by passive elevation of airway resistance. In contrast, the change in volume of each subject was associated with the lung volume estimated to cause the closure of the least stable segmental airway of his/her lungs. In addition, the measured drop in FVC post MCh was associated with the estimated volume of gas trapped behind closed segmental airways at RV.
conclusionsOur data supports the concept that hyperinflation caused by MCh-induced bronchoconstriction is the result of an actively controlled process where parenchymal distending forces on airways are increased to counteract their closure. To our knowledge, this is the first imaging-based study that associates inter-subject differences in whole lung behavior with the interdependence between individual airways and their surrounding parenchyma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.