Observational studyPloS one2018
Hypertension genetic risk score is associated with burden of coronary heart disease among patients referred for coronary angiography.
Observational study in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- CYP4V2 rs56413992 C > T was associated with the risk of coronary heart disease in the Chinese Han population: a case-control study.BMC medical genomics · 2023Article
- Evaluating the use of blood pressure polygenic risk scores across race/ethnic background groups.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Hypertensive heart disease: risk factors, complications and mechanisms.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- A hybrid cost-sensitive ensemble for heart disease prediction.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Article
- Plasma P-selectin level is associated with severity of coronary heart disease in Chinese Han population.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Validity of polygenic risk scores: are we measuring what we think we are?Human molecular genetics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
18 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent GWAS studies have identified more than 300 SNPs associated with variation in blood pressure. We investigated whether a genetic risk score constructed from these variants is associated with burden of coronary heart disease.
methodsFrom 2010-2014, 4,809 individuals admitted to coronary angiography in Capital Region of Copenhagen were genotyped. We calculated hypertension GRS comprised of GWAS identified SNPs associated with blood pressure. We performed logistic regression analyses to estimate the risk of hypertension and prevalent CHD. We also assessed the severity of CHD associated with the GRS. The analyses were performed using GRS quartiles. We used the Inter99 cohort to validate our results and to investigate for possible pleiotropy for the GRS with other CHD risk factors.
resultsIn COGEN, adjusted odds ratios comparing the 2nd, 3rd and 4th cumulative GRS quartiles with the reference were 1.12(95% CI 0.95-1.33), 1.35(95% CI 1.14-1.59) and 1.29(95% CI 1.09-1.53) respectively, for prevalent CHD. The adjusted multinomial logistic regression showed that 3rd and 4th GRS quartiles were associated with increased odds of developing two(OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.04-1.71 and OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.06-1.75, respectively) and three coronary vessel disease(OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.36-2.30 and OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.26-2.15, respectively). Similar results for incident CHD were observed in the Inter99 cohort. The hypertension GRS did not associate with type 2 diabetes, smoking, BMI or hyperlipidemia.
conclusionHypertension GRS quartiles were associated with an increased risk of hypertension, prevalent CHD, and burden of coronary vessel disease in a dose-response pattern. We showed no evidence for pleiotropy with other risk factors for CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.