Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30566250›Full record

ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2019

Chromatin Stability as a Target for Cancer Treatment.

Katerina V Gurova

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Updates inBiomedicines · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katerina V GurovaDepartment of Cell Stress Biology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9189-0712
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Modulation of cancer specific transcriptional factors with small moleculesR01CA197967 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI GUROVA, KATERINA V · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
Safety and anti-cancer efficacy of FACT inactivation in miceR21CA198395 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI GUROVA, KATERINA V · 2015 to 2016
$420k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197967NCI NIH HHS R21 CA198395NIH HHS RO1CA197967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this essay, I propose that DNA-binding anti-cancer drugs work more via chromatin disruption than DNA damage. Success of long-awaited drugs targeting cancer-specific drivers is limited by the heterogeneity of tumors. Therefore, chemotherapy acting via universal targets (e.g., DNA) is still the mainstream treatment for cancer. Nevertheless, the problem with targeting DNA is insufficient efficacy due to high toxicity. I propose that this problem stems from the presumption that DNA damage is critical for the anti-cancer activity of these drugs. DNA in cells exists as chromatin, and many DNA-targeting drugs alter chromatin structure by destabilizing nucleosomes and inducing histone eviction from chromatin. This effect has been largely ignored because DNA damage is seen as the major reason for anti-cancer activity. I discuss how DNA-binding molecules destabilize chromatin, why this effect is more toxic to tumoral than normal cells, and why cells die as a result of chromatin destabilization.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsChromatinDNAHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsChromatinDNAanti-cancer treatmentchromatin damageDNA-binding small moleculesDNA damage

Identifiers

PMID30566250
PMCPMC6522245
OpenAlexW2904417088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.