Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30565936›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2019

Real-Time, Digital LAMP with Commercial Microfluidic Chips Reveals the Interplay of Efficiency, Speed, and Background Amplification as a Function of Reaction Temperature and Time.

Justin C Rolando, Erik Jue, Nathan G Schoepp, Rustem F Ismagilov

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Digital seed amplification assay for TDP-43 aggregate quantification in CSF.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Digital seed amplification assay for TDP-43 aggregate quantification in CSF.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. RapidBiology methods & protocols · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justin C RolandoDivision of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering , California Institute of Technology , 1200 East California Boulevard , Mail Code 210-41, Pasadena , California , 91125 , United States.
Erik JueDivision of Biology & Biological Engineering , California Institute of Technology , 1200 East California Boulevard , Mail Code 210-41, Pasadena , California 91125 United States.
Nathan G SchoeppDivision of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering , California Institute of Technology , 1200 East California Boulevard , Mail Code 210-41, Pasadena , California , 91125 , United States.
Rustem F IsmagilovDivision of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering , California Institute of Technology , 1200 East California Boulevard , Mail Code 210-41, Pasadena , California , 91125 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3680-4399
California Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Predoctoral Biotechnology Leadership Training in Micro/NanomedicineT32GM112592 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI ARNOLD, FRANCES H · 2015 to 2019
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM112592Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time, isothermal, digital nucleic acid amplification is emerging as an attractive approach for a multitude of applications including diagnostics, mechanistic studies, and assay optimization. Unfortunately, there is no commercially available and affordable real-time, digital instrument validated for isothermal amplification; thus, most researchers have not been able to apply digital, real-time approaches to isothermal amplification. Here, we generate an approach to real-time digital loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) using commercially available microfluidic chips and reagents and open-source components. We demonstrate this approach by testing variables that influence LAMP reaction speed and the probability of detection. By analyzing the interplay of amplification efficiency, background, and speed of amplification, this real-time digital method enabled us to test enzymatic performance over a range of temperatures, generating high-precision kinetic and end-point measurements. We were able to identify the unique optimal temperature for two polymerase enzymes while accounting for amplification efficiency, nonspecific background, and time to threshold. We validated this digital LAMP assay and pipeline by performing a phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility test on 17 archived clinical urine samples from patients diagnosed with urinary tract infections. We provide all the necessary workflows to perform digital LAMP using standard laboratory equipment and commercially available materials. This real-time digital approach will be useful to others in the future to understand the fundamentals of isothermal chemistries, including which components determine amplification fate, reaction speed, and enzymatic performance. Researchers can also adapt this pipeline, which uses only standard equipment and commercial components, to quickly study and optimize assays using precise, real-time digital quantification, accelerating development of critically needed diagnostics.

Indexed as

Microfluidic Analytical TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesTemperatureAnti-Bacterial AgentsDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDNA, BacterialEscherichia coliHumansKineticsPhenotypeSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID30565936
PMCPMC6322147
OpenAlexW2904473123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.