Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30565736›Full record

ArticleJournal of community psychology2018

Community-academic partnerships in implementation research.

Melanie Pellecchia, David S Mandell, Heather J Nuske, Gazi Azad, Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Brenna B Maddox, Erica M Reisinger, Laura C Skriner, Danielle R Adams, Rebecca Stewart and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06576323 (An Intervention Mapping Approach to Closing the Gap in Maternal OUD and Infant NAS Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06576323 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

An Intervention Mapping Approach to Closing the Gap in Maternal OUD and Infant NAS Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2024 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsOpioid Use Disorder, Neonatal Abstinence SyndromeArmsAn implementation model for co-located Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) prescription in the NICU
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Improving the Fit of Interventions for Autism in Schools: Lessons Learned Following Paraeducator Coaching on the RUBIES Program.Journal of educational and psychological consultation : the official journal of the Association for Educational and Psychological Consultants · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melanie PellecchiaUniversity of Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-1924-0269
David S MandellUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Heather J NuskeUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Gazi AzadUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Courtney Benjamin WolkUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Brenna B MaddoxUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Erica M ReisingerUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Laura C SkrinerUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Danielle R AdamsUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Rebecca StewartUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Trevor HadleyUniversity of Pennsylvania.
Rinad S BeidasUniversity of Pennsylvania.
California University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Transforming mental health delivery through behavioral economics and implementation scienceP50MH113840 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BEIDAS, RINAD SARY, BUTTENHEIM, ALISON MEREDITH · 2017 to 2020
$6.6M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH113840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-academic partnerships(CAPs) are a critical component of implementing and sustaining evidence-based practices (EBPs) in community settings; however, the approaches used and mechanisms of change within CAPs have not been rigorously studied. The first step to advancing the science of CAP is to operationally define and contextualize the approaches used in CAP as part of the implementation process. Our research group has gleaned valuable lessons about the best ways to develop, support, and nurture community partnerships within the context of implementation. In this article, we share these lessons learned and relate them to implementation strategies that are most relevant to community-partnered implementation endeavors. The implementation strategies most relevant to CAPs are as follows: (a) building a coalition, (b) conducting local consensus discussions, (c) identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation, (d) facilitating interactive problem solving, (e) using an advisory board or workgroup, (f) tailoring strategies, (g) promoting adaptability, and (h) auditing and providing feedback. We offer suggestions for future research to systematically evaluate these strategies, with an eye toward advancing the science of CAP and implementation science and the goal of guiding future research and improving the implementation of EBPs in community settings.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity-Institutional RelationsEvidence-Based PracticeHumans

Identifiers

PMID30565736
PMCPMC13617992
OpenAlexW2796431536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.