Trial reportDeutsches Arzteblatt international2018
Coordinated Treatment of Depression in Elderly People in Primary Care.
Trial report in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-utility analysis of a collaborative and stepped care model in patients with mental disorders in German primary care (the COMET study).BMC psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Joint consultations in a structured GP-patient-geriatric-psychiatrist model for late-life depression: a cluster RCT.BMC primary care · 2025Trial
- Local, collaborative, stepped, and personalized care management for older people with chronic diseases - results from the randomized controlled LoChro-trial.BMC geriatrics · 2023Trial
- Joint consultations with general practitioners and geriatric psychiatrists for older adults with depression: a focus group study.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Impact of Collaborative Care on Depression in Patients Aged 60+: A Secondary Analysis of the GermanIMPACT Study on Behavioural Activation.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Recommendations Seem Arbitrary.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023Article
- The psychological consequences of living with coronary heart disease: Are patients' psychological needs served? A mixed-method study in Germany.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Luteolin Enhances Choroid Plexus 5-MTHF Brain Transport to Promote Hippocampal Neurogenesis in LOD Rats.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Current state of research on psychotherapy for home-living vulnerable older adults with depression.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2020Review
- Types of Utilization and Types of Treatment Response in a Collaborative Care Approach for Depressive Disorders in Old Age in Primary Care.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- Multiple Causes Behind Care Deficits.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019Article
- In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression in the elderly is mainly treated by primary care physicians; the treatment is often suboptimal because of the limited resources available in pri- mary care. New models of care in which treatment by a primary care physician is supplemented by the provision of brief, low-threshold interventions mediated by care managers are showing themselves to be a promising approach.
methodsIn this open, cluster-randomized, controlled study, we sought to determine the superiority of a model of this type over the usual form of treatment by a primary care physician. Patients in primary care aged 60 and above with moderate depres- sive manifestations (PHQ-9: 10-14 points) were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients in remission (score <5 on the Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-9) after the end of the intervention (12 months after baseline). The study was registered in the German Clinical Studies Registry (Deutsches Register für Klinische Studien) with the number DRKS00003589.
results71 primary care physicians entered 248 patients in the study, of whom 109 were in the control group and 139 in the intervention group. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the remission rate at 12 months was 25.6% (95% confidence interval [18.3; 32.8]) in the intervention group and 10.9% [5.4; 16.5]) in the control group (p = 0.004).
conclusionThis study demonstrates the superiority of the new care model in the primary care setting in Germany, as has been found in other countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.