Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30565544›Full record

Trial reportDeutsches Arzteblatt international2018

Coordinated Treatment of Depression in Elderly People in Primary Care.

Lars P Hölzel, Frederike Bjerregaard, Christiane Bleich, Sigrid Boczor, Martin Härter, Hans-Helmut König, Thomas Kloppe, Wilhelm Niebling, Martin Scherer, Iris Tinsel and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recommendations Seem Arbitrary.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023
    Article
  7. The psychological consequences of living with coronary heart disease: Are patients' psychological needs served? A mixed-method study in Germany.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Multiple Causes Behind Care Deficits.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019
    Article
  12. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lars P HölzelDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty ofMedicine, University of FreiburgParkklinik Wiesbaden Schlangenbad, SchlangenbadDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, HamburgInstitute of General Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, HamburgInstitute for Health Economics and Health Care Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, HamburgDivision of General Practice, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Universityof FreiburgClinic for Gerontopsychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Psychiatry, Emmendingen.
Frederike Bjerregaard
Christiane Bleich
Sigrid Boczor
Martin Härter
Hans-Helmut König
Thomas Kloppe
Wilhelm Niebling
Martin Scherer
Iris Tinsel
Michael Hüll

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression in the elderly is mainly treated by primary care physicians; the treatment is often suboptimal because of the limited resources available in pri- mary care. New models of care in which treatment by a primary care physician is supplemented by the provision of brief, low-threshold interventions mediated by care managers are showing themselves to be a promising approach.

methodsIn this open, cluster-randomized, controlled study, we sought to determine the superiority of a model of this type over the usual form of treatment by a primary care physician. Patients in primary care aged 60 and above with moderate depres- sive manifestations (PHQ-9: 10-14 points) were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients in remission (score <5 on the Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-9) after the end of the intervention (12 months after baseline). The study was registered in the German Clinical Studies Registry (Deutsches Register für Klinische Studien) with the number DRKS00003589.

results71 primary care physicians entered 248 patients in the study, of whom 109 were in the control group and 139 in the intervention group. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the remission rate at 12 months was 25.6% (95% confidence interval [18.3; 32.8]) in the intervention group and 10.9% [5.4; 16.5]) in the control group (p = 0.004).

conclusionThis study demonstrates the superiority of the new care model in the primary care setting in Germany, as has been found in other countries.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsDepressionFemaleGeriatricsGermanyHumansLogistic ModelsMalePrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30565544
PMCPMC6318433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.