Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30565486›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2019

The pharmacological management of acute behavioural disturbance: Data from a clinical audit conducted in UK mental health services.

Carol Paton, Clive E Adams, Stephen Dye, Elizabeth Fagan, Chike Okocha, Thomas Re Barnes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Carol Paton1 Royal College of Psychiatrists, Centre for Quality Improvement, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7756-1031
Clive E Adams2 Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Stephen Dye3 Ipswich Access and Treatment Team, Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich, UK.
Elizabeth Fagan1 Royal College of Psychiatrists, Centre for Quality Improvement, London, UK.
Chike Okocha4 Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust, Dartford, UK.
Thomas Re Barnes1 Royal College of Psychiatrists, Centre for Quality Improvement, London, UK.
Royal College of Psychiatrists · GBImperial College London · GBNorfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust · GBOxleas NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA quality improvement programme addressing prescribing practice for acutely disturbed behaviour was initiated by the Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health.

methodThis study analysed data from a baseline clinical audit conducted in inpatient mental health services in member trusts.

resultsFifty-eight mental health services submitted data on 2172 episodes of acutely disturbed behaviour. A benzodiazepine alone was administered in 60% of the 1091 episodes where oral medication only was used and in 39% of the 1081 episodes where parenteral medication (rapid tranquillisation) was used. Haloperidol was combined with lorazepam in 22% of rapid tranquillisation episodes and with promethazine in 3%. Physical violence towards others was strongly associated with receiving rapid tranquillisation in men (odds ratio 1.74, 1.25-2.44; p<0.001) as was actual or attempted self-harm in women (odds ratio 1.87, 1.19-2.94; p=0.007). Where physical violence towards others was exhibited, a benzodiazepine and antipsychotic was more likely to be prescribed than a benzodiazepine alone (odds ratio 1.39, 1.00-1.92; p=0.05). The data suggested that 25% of patients were at least 'extremely or continuously active' in the hour after rapid tranquillisation was administered.

conclusionThe current management of acutely disturbed behaviour with parenteral medication may fail to achieve a calming effect in up to a quarter of episodes. The most common rapid tranquillisation combination used was lorazepam and haloperidol, for which the randomised controlled trial evidence is very limited. Rapid tranquillisation prescribing practice was not wholly consistent with the relevant National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline, which recommends intramuscular lorazepam on its own or intramuscular haloperidol combined with intramuscular promethazine. Clinical factors prompting the use of rapid tranquillisation rather than oral medication may differ between the genders.

Indexed as

Problem BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedClinical AuditDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'United KingdomYoung Adultacute behavioural disturbanceaggressionantipsychotic medicationbenzodiazepineRapid tranquillisation

Identifiers

PMID30565486
PMCPMC6431784
OpenAlexW2905586602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.