Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30565424›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2019

Insertional translocation involving an additional nonchromothriptic chromosome in constitutional chromothripsis: Rule or exception?

Nehir Edibe Kurtas, Luciano Xumerle, Ursula Giussani, Alessandra Pansa, Laura Cardarelli, Veronica Bertini, Angelo Valetto, Thomas Liehr, Maria Clara Bonaglia, Edoardo Errichiello and 2 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Structural and Mechanistic Diversity of Constitutional Chromoanagenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  2. Chromothripsis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nehir Edibe KurtasDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8498-3400
Luciano XumerlePersonal Genomics srl, Department of Biotechnologies, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Ursula GiussaniOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Alessandra PansaOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.
Laura CardarelliLaboratorio Analisi CITOTEST. Sarmeola di Rubano, Padova, Italy.
Veronica BertiniAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Angelo ValettoAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Thomas LiehrInstitute of Human Genetics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Maria Clara BonagliaCytogenetics Laboratory, Scientific Institute, IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Lecco, Italy.
Edoardo ErrichielloDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Massimo DelledonnePersonal Genomics srl, Department of Biotechnologies, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Orsetta ZuffardiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChromothripsis, which is the local massive shattering of one or more chromosomes and their reassembly in a disordered array with frequent loss of some fragments, has been mainly reported in association with abnormal phenotypes. We report three unrelated healthy persons, two of which parenting a child with some degree of intellectual disability, carrying a chromothripsis involving respectively one, two, and three chromosomes, which was detected only after whole-genome sequencing. Unexpectedly, in all three cases a fragment from one of the chromothripsed chromosomes resulted to be inserted within a nonchromothripsed one.

methodsConventional cytogenetic techniques, paired-end whole-genome sequencing, polymerase chain reaction, and Sanger sequencing were used to characterize complex rearrangements, copy-number variations, and breakpoint sequences in all three families.

resultsIn two families, one parent was carrier of a balanced chromothripsis causing in the index case a deletion and a noncontiguous duplication at 3q in case 1, and a t(6;14) translocation associated with interstitial 14q deletion in case 2. In the third family, an unbalanced chromothripsis involving chromosomes 6, 7, and 15 was inherited to the proband by the mosaic parent. In all three parents, the chromothripsis was concurrent with an insertional translocation of a portion of one of the chromothriptic chromosomes within a further chromosome that was not involved in the chromothripsis event.

conclusionOur findings show that (a) both simple and complex unbalanced rearrangements may result by the recombination of a cryptic parental balanced chromothripsis and that (b) insertional translocations are the spy of more complex rearrangements and not simply a three-breakpoint event.

Indexed as

ChromothripsisAdolescentChildFemaleHumansInfantIntellectual DisabilityMaleTranslocation, Geneticchromothripsisinsertional translocationsmosaicrecombinant rearrangementsWGS

Identifiers

PMID30565424
PMCPMC6393660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.