Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30565369›Full record

Observational studyDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2019

A multinational observational study assessing insulin use: Understanding the determinants associated with progression of therapy.

Kausik K Ray, David M Kendall, Zhenxiang Zhao, Xiaomei Peng, A Enrique Caballero, William H Polonsky, Beth L Nordstrom, Ludi Fan, Bradley H Curtis, Melanie J Davies

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Kausik K RayFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7166-060X
David M KendallGlobal Health Outcomes, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Zhenxiang ZhaoGlobal Health Outcomes, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Xiaomei PengGlobal Health Outcomes, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
A Enrique CaballeroHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
William H PolonskyBehavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, California.
Beth L NordstromReal-world Evidence, Evidera, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Ludi FanGlobal Health Outcomes, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Bradley H CurtisGlobal Health Outcomes, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Melanie J DaviesDiabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9987-9371
Eli Lilly (United States) · USDiagnostics for the Real World (United States) · USHarvard University · USImperial College London · GBInstitute of Behavioral Sciences · JPUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo describe global patterns of insulin treatment and to assess the impact of patient, provider, health system and economic influences on treatment decisions for patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D).

methodsThis prospective cohort study of insulin-treated patients with T2D was conducted across 18 countries categorized as high, upper-middle or lower-middle income regions. Information collected from patients included knowledge of diabetes, experiences and interactions with their healthcare provider. Physician information included specialty, practice size, availability of diabetes support services, volume of diabetes patients treated and time spent per patient. Physicians determined an individualized haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) target for each patient by the start of the study. Changes in T2D therapies and HbA1c were recorded for 2 years.

resultsComplete treatment data were available for 2528 patients. Median age was 61 years and median duration of diabetes was 11.4 years. Changes to treatment regimen occurred in 90.0% of patients, but changes were less common in countries with a higher economic status (P < 0.001). Most treatment changes involved insulin, with changes in dose the most common. Overall predictors of change in insulin therapy included younger age, use of any insulin regimen other than basal only, higher mean baseline HbA1c and longer duration of T2D. HbA1c levels remained constant regardless of regional economic status. At baseline, 20.6% of patients were at their HbA1c target; at 2 years this was 26.8%.

conclusionsAmong insulin-treated patients with T2D, treatment changes were common; however, only approximately one-fourth of individuals achieved their HbA1c target.

Indexed as

AgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Disease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIncomeInsulinMaleMiddle AgedSelf EfficacySocioeconomic FactorsInsulinglycaemic targetshaemoglobin A1cinsulinpatient outcomestype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID30565369
PMCPMC6590265
OpenAlexW2904511638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.