ArticleLasers in medical science2019
Comparison of two different laser photobiomodulation protocols on the viability of random skin flap in rats.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Photobiomodulation in promoting increased Skin Flap Viability: a systematic review of animal studies.Lasers in medical science · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of the invasive and non-invasive systemic photobiomodulation using low-level laser in experimental models: A systematic review.Lasers in medical science · 2023Pooled it
- Association of a Skin Dressing Made With the Organic Part of Marine Sponges and Photobiomodulation on the Wound Healing in an Animal Model.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Standardized Pre-clinical Surgical Animal Model Protocol to Investigate the Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Ischemic Flap Healing.Biological procedures online · 2024Article
- Photobiomodulation effect in tumoral necrosis factor-alpha(TNF-α) on the viability of random skin flap in rats.Lasers in medical science · 2022Article
- Effects of photobiomodulation therapy in chondrocyte response by in vitro experiments and experimental model of osteoarthritis in the knee of rats.Lasers in medical science · 2022Article
- Treatment of partial injury of the calcaneus tendon with heterologous fibrin biopolymer and/or photobiomodulation in rats.Lasers in medical science · 2022Article
- Comparison of photobiomodulation in the treatment of skin injury with an open wound in mice.Lasers in medical science · 2021Article
- Non-invasive physical therapy as salvage measure for ischemic skin flap: A literature review.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Review
- Effects of photobiomodulation therapy in the integration of skin graft in rats.Lasers in medical science · 2020Article
- Effects of red and near-infrared LED light therapy on full-thickness skin graft in rats.Lasers in medical science · 2020Article
- Applications of photobiomodulation in hearing research: from bench to clinic.Biomedical engineering letters · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To identify the best low level laser photobiomodulation application site at the same irradiation time to increase the viability of the skin flap in rats. Eighteen male rats (Rattus norvegicus: var. Albinus, Rodentia Mammalia) were randomly distributed into three groups (n = 6). Group I (GI) was submitted to simulated laser photobiomodulation; group II (GII) was submitted to laser photobiomodulation at three points in the flap cranial base, and group III (GIII) was submitted to laser photobiomodulation at 12 points distributed along the flap. All groups were irradiated with an Indium, Galium, Aluminum, and Phosphorus diode laser (InGaAlP), 660 nm, with 50 mW power, irradiated for a total time of 240 s in continuous emission mode. The treatment started immediately after performing the cranial base random skin flap (10 × 4 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
30565200What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.