Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30565159›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2019

Potential organ donor identification and system accountability: expert guidance from a Canadian consensus conference.

Samara Zavalkoff, Sam D Shemie, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Michaël Chassé, Janet E Squires, Stefanie Linklater, Amber Appleby, David Hartell, Jehan Lalani, Ken Lotherington and 2 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Navigating the gift of life: demystifying the organ donation and transplantation pathway in Canada.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Donor audits in deceased organ donation: a scoping review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Canadian organ donation organizations' donor audit processes: an environmental scan.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Samara ZavalkoffDivision of Critical Care, McGill University Health Centre and Research Institute, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada. samara.zavalkoff@mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4447-1977
Sam D ShemieDivision of Critical Care, McGill University Health Centre and Research Institute, Montreal Children's Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jeremy M GrimshawClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital and Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital - General Campus, Centre for Practice - Changing Research (CPCR), Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Michaël ChasséCanadian National Transplant Research Program (CNTRP), Suite 220, 209 Carruthers Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 1N6 , Canada.
Janet E SquiresClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital and Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital - General Campus, Centre for Practice - Changing Research (CPCR), Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Stefanie LinklaterClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital and Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital - General Campus, Centre for Practice - Changing Research (CPCR), Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Amber ApplebyCanadian Blood Services, Deceased Donation and Transplantation, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
David HartellCanadian National Transplant Research Program (CNTRP), Suite 220, 209 Carruthers Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 1N6 , Canada.
Jehan LalaniCanadian Blood Services, Deceased Donation and Transplantation, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Ken LotheringtonCanadian Blood Services, Deceased Donation and Transplantation, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Greg KnollClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital and Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital - General Campus, Centre for Practice - Changing Research (CPCR), Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Potential Organ Donation Identification and System Accountability (PODISA) Conference Participants (Appendix)

Funding

CIHR TFU 127880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDeceased donation rates in Canada remain below the predicted potential and lag behind leading countries. Missing a potential donor leads to preventable death and disability of transplant candidates and increased healthcare costs.

methodsStakeholders were invited to a national consensus conference on improving deceased organ donor identification and referral (ID&R) and healthcare system accountability. In advance, participants received evidence-based, background documents addressing death audits, clinical triggers, required referral legislation, ethics, clinical pathways, and donation standards. At the conference, expert presentations and summaries of background information prepared by the Steering Committee informed group discussions of the preset questions. The conference's themes were: 1) expectations of potential donors, recipients and their families; 2) donor ID&R: clinical and legal perspectives; 3) enhancing accountability: gaps and solutions; and 4) enhancing accountability: quality/safety organizations.

resultsThirty-seven consensus statements were generated. At the healthcare professional (HCP) level, key statements include: 1) donation be consistently addressed as part of end-of-life care but only after a decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment; 2) HCP know how and when to identify and refer potential donors; and 3) transplant candidates be informed of local allocation guidelines and performance. At the healthcare system level, key statements include: 1) national adoption of clinical criteria to trigger ID&R; 2) dedicated resources to match donation activities, including transfer of a potential donor; 3) performance measurement through death audits; 4) reporting and investigation of missed donation opportunities (MDO); 5) recognition of top performers; and 6) missed donor ID&R be considered a preventable and critical safety incident.

conclusionOur consensus statements establish HCP and healthcare system responsibilities regarding potential organ donor ID&R and include the tracking, reviewing and elimination of MDO through system-wide death audits. Once implemented, these consensus statements will help honour patients' wishes to donate, improve service to potential transplant recipients, and support HCPs in fulfilling their ethical and legal responsibilitites. Next steps include implementation, assessment of their impact on donation rates, and investigation of new evidence-based targets for system improvement.

Indexed as

Decision MakingCanadaDeathDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansProfessional RoleTerminal CareTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue Donors

Identifiers

PMID30565159
PMCPMC6407748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.